Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v10i1.3750Keywords:
Open Government Data, Satu Data Indonesia, Open Data Portal, Open Data, Open Data PolicyAbstract
Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) merupakan upaya untuk menyediakan data yang kredibel, akuntabel, dan mutakhir dengan jalan membangun database pemerintah yang dapat digunakan sebagai acuan dalam setiap pengambilan kebijakan dan implementasinya. Inisiatif tersebut merupakan mandat Presiden yang tertuang dalam Peraturan Presiden No. 39 Tahun 2019. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya masih dijumpai banyak tantangan dalam perencanaan, pengumpulan, pemeriksaan, dan penyebarluasan data. Dengan pendekatan literature review, tujuan dari studi ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan atau permasalahan implementasi SDI dan menentukan Critical Success Factors (CSFs) dalam pelaksanaan SDI dari berbagai CSF Open Government Data. Hasil dari studi ini diharapkan dapat menjadi masukan dalam pelaksanaan SDI dan penyusunan kebijakan turunan dari Peraturan Presiden mengenai SDI.
References
Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49(July), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
Afful-Dadzie, E. & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2017). Open Government Data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 244–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.005
Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., & Hameed, K. (2019). A systematic literature review of data governance and cloud data governance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23(5), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1104-3
Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., Daly, M., Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2019). Critical Success Factors for Data Governance : A Theory Building Approach Critical Success Factors for Data Governance : A Theory Building Approach. Information Systems Management, 36(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2019.1589670
Alzamil, Z. S., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2019). A new model for effective and efficient open government data. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 16(4), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-019-00066-w
Bappenas. (2017). Tentang Satu Data Indonesia. Retrieved from https://satudata.bappenas.go.id/doc/about-sdi
Bappenas. (2019). Peran Satu Data Indonesia dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Terbuka The Role of Satu Data Indonesia to Propel the Practices of Open Government. Retrieved from https://ogi.bappenas.go.id/assets/OGITALK_4_ogi_news.pdf
Bayu, D. J. (2020). Implementasi Program Satu Data Indonesia Terganjal Berbagai Kendala. Retrieved November 29, 2020, from https://katadata.co.id/yuliawati/berita/5f6c878de0680/implementasi-program-satu-data-indonesia-terganjal-berbagai-kendala
Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479
Borgman, H., & Boekamp, T. (2016). Dotting the I and Crossing (out) the T in IT Governance : New Challenges for Information Governance. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.608
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004
Cingolani, L. (2021). The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101522
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
de Juana-Espinosa, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). Open government data portals in the European Union: Considerations, development, and expectations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, 119769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119769
DESA. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020 Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development With Addendum on COVID-19 Response. New York: United Nations.
Donker, F. W., & Loenen, B. Van. (2016). How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem ? International Journal of Digital Earth, 8947(September). https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938
European data portal. (2018). Open Data Goldbook for Data Managers and Data Holders. European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/european_data_portal_-_open_data_goldbook.pdf
Gascó-Hernández, M., Martin, E. G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.003
Gryseels, M., Manuel, N., Salazar, L., & Wibowo, P. (2015). Ten ideas to maximize the socioeconomic impact of ICT in Indonesia, (March), 1–20.
Gunawan, D., & Amalia, A. (2016). The Implementation of Open Data in Indonesia. IEEE.
Hivos. (2019). Perpres Satu Data Indonesia disahkan, Apa Dampaknya bagi Kesejahteraan Masyarakat? Retrieved from https://sea.hivos.org/news/perpres-satu-data-indonesia-disahkan-apa-dampaknya-bagi-kesejahteraan-masyarakat/
ITU. (2019). Digital Skills Insights 2019. International Tellecommunication Units.
Kemensetneg. Peraturan Presiden No.39 Tahun 2019 Tentang Satu Data Indonesia (2019). Indonesia.
Mawanda, A. H. (2020). Satu Data Indonesia: Antara Ada dan Tiada. Suarakarya. Retrieved from https://www.suarakarya.id/detail/111198/Satu-Data-Indonesia-Antara-Ada-Dan-Tiada
Nielsen, O. B., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2019). Why Governing Data Is Difficult : Findings from Danish Local Government. International Federation for Information Processing, 1, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5
Nikiforova, A., & McBride, K. (2021). Open government data portal usability: A user-centred usability analysis of 41 open government data portals. Telematics and Informatics, 58, 101539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101539
Nugroho, Y. (2017). After Data Synchronising and Sharing - What Do We Learn? Lesson from Satu Data. Jakarta: Kantor Staf Presiden RI.
OECD. (2016). OECD Kajian Open Government Indonesia 2016 Hal-Hal Pokok.
OGI. (2018). Rencana Aksi Keterbukaan Pemerintah Indonesia 2018-2020. Jakarta: Open Government Indonesia.
OGP. (2020). Open Government Partnership Independent Reporting Mechanism Indonesia : Comments received on the Design Report for the Fifth OGP action plan ( 2018-2020 ) (Vol. 06).
OGP, Aceron, J., & G-Watch. (2017). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Philippines End - of - Term Report 2015 - 2017. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, Genna, F., & Ecorys. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Italy Design Report 2019 – 2021. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, & Hwang, S. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): South Korea Progress Report 2014-2015. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, & Olesk, M. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Finland Design Report. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, & Patra, R. (2020). Mekanisme Pelaporan Independen (IRM): Laporan Perancangan Indonesia 2018 – 2020. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, Skedsmo, P. W., & Nansen, F. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism ( IRM ): Norway Design Report 2019 – 2021. Open Government Partnership.
OGP, & Zinnbauer, D. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Germany Design Report 2018 – 2020. Open Government Partnership.
Open Data Unit. (2017). Open Data Strategy 2017 -2022. Dublin.
Purwanto, Arie; Jansen, Marijne; Zuiderwijk-van-Eijk, A. (2017). Towards an Open Government Data Success Model A case study from Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Digital Government. Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/files/23067045/Full_Paper_Revised_Arie_Purwanto.pdf
Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizen engagement with open government data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2019-0051
Retnowati, Manongga, D. H. F., & Sunarto, H. (2018). Prinsip-Prinsip Open Government Data. Proceeding on Conference on Electrical Engineering, Telematics, Industrial Technology, and Creative Media, 25–29.
Ruijer, E., & Meijer, A. (2020). Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
Sayogo, D. S., Budi, S., & Yuli, C. (2018). Critical Success Factors of Open Government and Open Data at Local Government Level in Indonesia. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018040103
Stewart, D. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Australia Design Report 2018 – 2020.
Thomas, E. (2020). Satu Data Indonesia: Menuju Big Data Pemerintah. Jakarta: FGD Kesiapan Big Data Pemerintah.
Wang, V., & Shepherd, D. (2020). Exploring the extent of openness of open government data – A critique of open government datasets in the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101405
Wicaksono, B., Rusdianto, D. S., & Brata, A. H. (2018). Pengembangan Sistem Portal Satu Data Indonesia Pada Kantor Staf Presiden Menggunakan Comprehensive Kerbal Archieve Network ( CKAN ). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(8), 2882–2888.
World Wide Web Foundation. (2018). Open Data Barometer Leaders Edition. Washington DC.
Zhao, Y., & Fan, B. (2021). Understanding the key factors and configurational paths of the open government data performance: Based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101580
Zhenbin, Y., Kankanhalli, A., Ha, S., & Tayi, G. K. (2020). What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives? an innovation resource perspective. Information & Management, 57(3), 103179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103179
Zhu, X. (2017). The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement: A historical case study. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
