Indonesia Journalistic Code of Ethics (News Aggregation Study)

Dyah Permana Erawaty, nfn Irwansyah


News aggregation is the process of taking news from published sources, reshaping it, and publishing it as a new news. News aggregation becomes an important part of journalism. This research intends to examine whether the news aggregation complies with journalistic principles in Indonesia or not. The significance of this research for the Indonesian community is that they understand the news aggregation in the context of Indonesian journalism. This research used a qualitative approach in the post-positivist paradigm. Data was collected by narrative literature review and interviews. The informants were the expert from the Indonesia Press Council. In addition, to see trends in the qualitative use of news aggregations, interviews were conducted with three news aggregation users. The analysis resulted that the news aggregator is not a journalistic media, because it has not yet met the criteria of Indonesian Law no. 40 of 1999 concerning the Press, as well as the Cyber Media guidelines. The news aggregator content are news and opinions those were collected from the press media and social media. Even though the news aggregators content was not believed to be true, smartphone users will continue to use it.


Indonesian Press Council, Journalistic Code of Ethics, media press, news aggregator


Lashinsky, A. (2009). Eric Schmidt wishes Google could save newspapers - Jan. 7, 2009. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from

Anderson, C. W. (2013). What aggregators do: Towards a networked concept of journalistic expertise in the digital age. Journalism.

Athey, S., Mobius, M., & Pal, J. (2017). The Impact of Aggregators on Internet News.

Brs. (2014). Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from

Crichton D., Christel B., Shidham A., Valderrama A., & Karmel J. (2010). Introduction | Journalism in the Digital Age. Retrieved May 26, 2019, from

Davies, P. (2000). The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice Oxford Review of Education. Oxford Review of Education.

Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (2009). The value of “traditional” reviews in the era of systematic reviewing. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Duffy, A., Tandoc, E. C., & Ling, R. (2018). Frankenstein journalism. Information Communication and Society, 21(10), 1354–1368.

Edo, C., Yunquera, J., & Bastos, H. (2019). Content syndication in news aggregators. Towards devaluation of professional journalistic criteria. Comunicar.

Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism.

Green, B.N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative review of the literature for peer-revied journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine.

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals : secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(Number 3), 101–117.

Jeon, D. S., & Nasr, N. (2016). News aggregators and competition among newspapers on the internet. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.

King, W. R. (2005). Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

Lee, A. M., & Chyi, H. I. (2015). The Rise of Online News Aggregators: Consumption and Competition. JMM International Journal on Media Management.

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Reuters Institute.

Oxman, A. D. (1994). Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles. BMJ.

Oxman, A. D., Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., Bass, E., Brill-Edwards, P., Browman, G., … Wilson, M. (1994). Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: VI. How to Use an Overview. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association.

Puddephatt, A. (2011). The Importance of self regulation of the media in upholding freedom of expression; Series CI debates: communication and information; Vol.:9; 2011. Rio de Janeiro: UNESCO. Retrieved from

Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology.

Sackett, D. L. (1981). How to read clinical journals. Canadian Medical Association Journal.

We Are Social. (2018). Digital in 2018 Global Overview. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from

Williams, C. J. (1998). The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine. Annals of Oncology.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License