Crowdsourcing Public Participation Process for Solve Hoaks
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 1069
Download : 2435
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kemajuan teknologi di ruang publik baru memberikan peluang sekaligus tantangan bagi keterlibatan publik. Kehadiran media sosial membuat publik bebas berpendapat dan memilih informasi. Model crowsourcing berbasis web dapat membantu mendistribusikan kontranarasi terhadap berita bohong dengan menggunakan partisipasi warga. Tulisan ini akan mencoba mengeksplorasi tantangan publik dalam upaya meredam hoax, khususnya dengan menggunakan solusi kreatif. Konsep yang digunakan adalah crowdsourcing dengan media web sebagai teknologi tepat guna untuk memanfaatkan potensi masyarakat secara luas. Pengggambaran dari crowsourcing dalam contoh penanggualanan isu hoax yang dilakukan oleh mafindo dan situs turn back hoax.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Andriansyah, Miftah., Oswari, Teddy., & Budi Prijanto. 2009. Crowdsourcing: Konsep Sumber Daya Kerumunan dalam Abad Partisipasi Komunitas Internet. Depok : Universitas Gunadarma
Arthana, I Ketut Resika., Setemen, Komang., I Ketut Purnawarman., Nyoman Dini Andiani. 2016. Penggalian Dan Penyebaran Potensi Wisata Melalui Aplikasi Mobile Dengan Konsep Crowdsourcing. Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaAshton, Daniel. 2015. “Producing Participatory Media: (Crowd) Sourcing Content in Britain/Life in a Day.” Media International Australia, no. 154: 101–11. doi:10.1177/1329878X1515400113.
Aten, Kathryn, and Gail Fann Thomas. 2016. “Crowdsourcing Strategizing: Communication Technology Affordances and the Communicative Constitution of Organizational Strategy.” International Journal of Business Communication 53 (2): 148–80. doi:10.1177/2329488415627269.
Bassi, Harpreet, Laura Misener, Christopher Lee, and Andrew M. Johnson. 2019. “Exploring the Characteristics of Crowdsourcing: An Online Observational Study.” Journal of Information Sciences. doi:10.1177/0165551519828626.
Brabham, Daren C. 2008. “Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (1): 75–90. doi:10.1177/1354856507084420.
———. 2009. “Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects.” Planning Theory 8 (3): 242–62. doi:10.1177/1473095209104824.
Estellés-Arolas, Enrique, and Fernando González-Ladrón-De-Guevara. 2012. “Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition.” Journal of Information Science 38 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1177/0165551512437638.
Foster, Paul. 2005. “Secret Mark: Uncovering a Hoax.” The Expository Times 117 (2): 66–68. doi:10.1177/001452460511700207.
Kumar, Prashant, Tao Meng, and Sajal Kabiraj. 2019. “Effect of Crowdsourcing on Consumer Brand Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.” Business Perspectives and Research 7 (1): 42–58. doi:10.1177/2278533718800190.
Lastovka, Maria. 2015. “Crowdsourcing as New Instrument in Policy-Making: Making the Democratic Process More Engaging.” European View 14 (1): 93–99. doi:10.1007/s12290-015-0345-7.
Sørensen, Inge Ejbye. 2012. “Crowdsourcing and Outsourcing: The Impact of Online Funding and Distribution on the Documentary Film Industry in the UK.” Media, Culture and Society 34 (6): 726–43. doi:10.1177/0163443712449499.
Sutherlin, Gwyneth. 2013. “A Voice in the Crowd: Broader Implications for Crowdsourcing Translation during Crisis.” Journal of Information Science 39 (3): 397–409. doi:10.1177/0165551512471593.
Veil, Shari R., Timothy L. Sellnow, and Elizabeth L. Petrun. 2011. “Hoaxes and the Paradoxical Challenges of Restoring Legitimacy.” Management Communication Quarterly 26 (2): 322–45. doi:10.1177/0893318911426685.