Implikasi Penggunaan Data Besar terhadap Metode Penelitian Agenda-Setting

Article Sidebar

PDF (Indonesian)
Published: Jun 24, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2019.2021
Keywords:
Agenda-Setting, Agenda Berjaringan, Data Besar
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 2212
Download : 4203
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Karman Karman
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika

Abstract

Teknologi internet menjadi prasarana lahirnya teknologi/media komunikasi, yaitu media sosial. Aktivitas komunikasi manusia ini menyisakan jejak digital dan menyimpan Data Besar. Hal ini memberikan manfaat bagi peneliti untuk melakukan riset ilmiah, termasuk riset komunikasi tentang agenda-setting. Tulisan ini akan mendiskusikan “bagaimana implikasi dengan adanya Data Besar terhadap perkembangan teori agenda-setting”. Artikel ini bermaksud untuk mendeskripsikan implikasi penggunaan Data Besar terhadap metode penelitian agenda-setting. Oleh karena itu, penulis meninjau literatur berkaitan dengan riset agenda-setting untuk mendapatkan perkembangan mutakhir teori tersebut. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah kehadiran Data Besar dari aktivitas komunikasi manusia di media sosial memberikan implikasi kepada teori agenda-setting. Teori ini berubah dari hierarkis ke jaringan. Hal ini tidak hanya fokus ke isu dan atribut, tetapi juga kemenonjolan jaringan agenda (isu, atribut). Riset agenda-setting mengandung sejumlah keterbatasan. Keterbatasan tersebut adalah cenderung menganalisis opini publik pada level agregat dan mengabaikan perbedaan kebutuhan orientasi, kurang mempertimbangkan conditional probability, lebih fokus pada hubungan nondireksional dan hubungan yang eksplisit, tidak adanya riset longitudinal, dan riset agenda-setting yang berjaringan tidak diikuti dengan teori jaringan. Penelitian selanjutnya perlu melakukan riset untuk mengisi beberapa keterbatasan di atas.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 23 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

References

Anderson. (1988). A spreading activation theory of mind. Readings in Cognitive Science; a Perspective from Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3

Anderson, A. R., & Pirolli, P. L. (1984). Spread of Activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.791

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. In A decade in internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society (Vol. 21). Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute.

Caroll, C. E. (2016). Mapping the contours of the third level of agenda setting. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The power of information network: New directions for agenda setting (1st ed., pp. 34–52). New York: Routledge.

Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2016). First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266

Cheng, Y. (2016). The third-level agenda-setting study: an examination of media, implicit, and explicit public agendas in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1130159

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). Spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407

Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124

Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 532–33.

Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2017). Still an Agenda Setter: Traditional News Media and Public Opinion During the Transition From Low to High Choice Media Environments. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12327

Erl, T., Khattak, W., & Buhler, P. (2016). Big Data Fundamentals Concepts, Drivers & Techniques. Prentice Hall: ServiceTechPress.

Flew, T. (2005). New Media, and Introduction (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Groshek, J., & Groshek, M. C. (2013). Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of socialnetworking sites in intermedia agenda setting accross topic overn time. Media and Communication, 1(1).

Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an Imagined Community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–318.

Guo, L. (2012). The Application of Social Network Analysis in Agenda Setting Research: A Methodological Exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148

Guo, L. (2016). A Theoretical Explication of The Network Agenda Setting Model: Current Status and Future Directions. In L. Gui & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), The Power of Information Networks: New Directions For Agenda Setting (1st ed., pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.

Guo, L. (2017). Network Agenda Setting Model. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from http://www.leiguo.net/research/network-agenda-setting-model/

Guo, L. (2019). Media Agenda Diversity and Intermedia Agenda Setting in a Controlled Media Environment : A Computational Analysis of China ’ s Online News Media Agenda Diversity and Intermedia Agenda Setting in a China ’ s Online News. Journalism Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1601029

Guo, L., & Vargo, C. J. (2017). Global Intermedia Agenda Setting: A Big Data Analysis of International News Flow. Journal of Communication, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12311

Guo, L., Vargo, C. J., Pan, Z., Ding, W., & Ishwar, P. (2016). Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016639231

Howe, M. L., Wimmer, M. C., Gagnon, N., & Plumpton, S. (2009). An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.002

json.org. (2017). Pengenalan JSON. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from http://www.json.org/json-id.html

Jungherr, A. (2014). The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087

Karman, K. (2017). Disruptif Teknologi Internet dan Eksistensi Media Cetak. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 21(2), 182–192.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Education (Vol. 79). https://doi.org/10.2307/2288384

Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, Cabs, and Coffee Houses: Social Media and Oppositional Movements in Egypt, 2004-2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion: With a New Introduction by Michael Curtis. New Brunswick-New Jersey, USA., London, UK: Transaction Publishers.

Maireder, A., Weeks, B. E., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Schlögl, S. (2017). Big Data and Political Social Networks: Introducing Audience Diversity and Communication Connector Bridging Measures in Social Network Theory. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315617262

Marx, K. (1887). Capital A Critique of Political Economy Volume I Book One: The Process of Production of Capital. (F. Engels, Ed.). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The Mass media and the public opinion (1st ed.). Cambridge-UK: Polity Press.

McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda (2nd ed.). Cambridge,UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opionion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda setting research: twenty five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x

McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A.Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2014). New Directions in Agenda-Setting Theory and Research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871

McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Mirabito, M. M. ., & Morgenstern, B. L. (2004). The New Communications Technologies : Applications, Policy, and Impact (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.

Monge, Peter R., Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.

Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., & Bae, S. Y. (2014). The Dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088

Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Information control and terrorism: Tracking the Mumbai terrorist attack through twitter. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9275-8

Pacey, A. (1983). Technology: practice and culture. The Culture of Technology. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Reese, S. ., & Danielian, L. . (1989). Intermedia influence and the drug issue. In P. J. Shoemaker (Ed.), Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public (1st ed., pp. 29–46). NewYork, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ritzer, G., Dean, P., & Jurgenson, N. (2012). The coming of age of the prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429368

Sharon, M. (2016). An expanded perspective on network agenda setting between tradisional media and Twitter political discussion groups in “everyday talk.” In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The power of information network: New directions for agenda setting (1st ed., pp. 66–87). New York: Routledge.

Sharon, M., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Network gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press and Politics, 18, 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.

Twitter. (2017). Twitter. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/

Vargo, C. J., & Guo, L. (2016). Networks, Big Data, and Intermedia Agenda Setting: An Analysis of Traditional, Partisan, and Emerging Online U.S. News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679976

Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., Mccombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (2014). Network Issue Agendas on Twitter During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089

Vu, H. T., Guo, L., & McCombs, M. E. (2014). Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550090

Wang, Q. (2016). A comparative case study: Network agenda setting in crisis and non-crisis news. Global Media and China, 1(3), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416668870