Praktik Government Public Relations Paska Otonomi Daerah, Sebuah Tinjauan dengan Kasus Penyuluh KB Sebagai Government Public Relations Bidang KB
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Multidimentional crisis that occurred in the late 1990s in Indonesia, has influenced the government
management. In the national level, it appeared a legal freedom of the press, and changes on
government Public Relations institution. While in the level of local government, it was applied a
regional autonomy through the Law No.22/1999. These changes also affected other sectors of
management, including Public Relations, which in government practice is called Government Public
Relations. It beared paradigm shifting in the field of Public Relations after 1999, as well as the
challenges on Government Public Relations practice due to the implementation of decentralization.
Krisis multidimensional yang terjadi akhir tahun 1990-an di Indonesia, telah mempengaruhi
manajemen pemerintahan Indonesia. Pada skala nasional, terjadi legalitas kebebasan pers dan
berpendapat, serta perubahan institusi Public Relations pemerintahan. Sementara pada level
pemerintahan daerah, diberlakukan penyelenggaraan otonomi daerah melalui Undang-Undang
No.22/1999. Perubahan-perubahan tersebut ikut mempengaruhi sektor penyelenggaraan lainnya,
termasuk bidang Public Relations, yang dalam pemerintahan disebut Government Public Relations
(Humas Pemerintah). Terjadi pergeseran paradigma bidang Public Relations setelah tahun 1999, serta
tantangan praktik Government Public Relationsakibat implementasi desentralisasi.
Rincian Artikel
Referensi
Brown, R. E. 2003. “St. Paul as a public relations practitioner: A metatheoretical speculation on
messianic communication and symmetry”.
Firman, T. 2009. Potential Impacts of Indonesia’s Fiscal Decentralization Reform on Urban and
Regional Development: Towards a Pattern of Spatial Disparity. Space and Policy7(3): 247-271.
Grunig, J.E. 1992. Communication, Public Relation, and Effective Organization, Excellence in
Public Relation and Communication Management.New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Grunig, J.E., T. Hunt. 1984. Managing Public relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
Hersey, P., K.H. Blanchard. 1998. Management of Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice
Hall.
Hughland, A. 1996. Public Relations Theory and Democratic Theory. The Public 3: 15-25
Kadir, R. 2009. “Humas Pemerintah dan Pencitraan; Studi tentang Peran Humas dalam Pencitraan
Malang sebagai Kota pendidikan”.
Kasali, Rhenald. 1994. Manajemen Public Relations. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kasali, Rhenald. 2005. Manajemen Public Relations Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta:
Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Marston, John E. 1979. Modern Public Relations, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miller, K. S. 2000. U.S. Public Relations History: Knowledge and Limitations. Communication
Yearbook.
Pratikno, P. 2008. “Recommendations on Modifications of Regional Development Policy:
Proliferation and Amalgamation of Regions”. Unpublished Policy Paper, Democratic Support
Program, United States Agency for International Development, February 29.
Rahmadi, F. 1994. Publik Relations dalam Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Ruslan, Rosady. 1999. Manajemen Humas dan Manajemen Komunikasi, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada.
Tambera, Haris. 2011. “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Humas Pemerintah Dalam Menunjang Penyelenggaraan
Otonomi Daerah (Studi Di Kantor Sekretariat Daerah Kota Kendari)”.
Wasesa, Silih Agung Wasesa dan Jim Macnamara. 2005. Strategi Public Relations, Jakarta: Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Wilcox, Dennis L. 2006. “The Landscape of Today’s Global Public Relations”, Analisis.
Wilson, L.J., J.D. Ogden. 2003. Strategic Communications Planning, New Jersey: Kendall-Hall
Publishing Co.
Xavier, Robin, Kim Johnston and Amisha Patel. 2005.“Operationalising Strategy: An Evaluation of
Strategy in Public Relations Campaigns”. ANZMAC.