Democracy Issue Usage via Website by Radical Group in Opposing Indonesian Government
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 559
Download : 385
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article dealt with the issue of how radical groups include Indonesian government as a democratic country, through the practice of language usage in online media. That radical group is Jamaah Ansharu Tauhid (JAT). We collect data from the web page (www.ansharuttauhid.com) with the word of ‘democracy’ in the proses of query. We determine contents containing government representation on democratic issue. We analysed the text with an analysis model of representation of social actors and social action as Theo VanLeeuwen introduced. We conclude that JAT include the Indonesian government as outsiders in the context of religion. The government is different from JAT in the context of religion. JAT delegitimized Indonesian government with some language techniques. JAT symbolized Indonesia government as “thoghut”, and included it in the web contents negatively (e.g., by pseudo title, epithets, etc.). On the contrary, JAT appreciated terrorism perpetrators by harnessing honorification technique. The inclusion and delegitimacy of the Indonesian government depart from religion as an idiosyncratic system of meaning.
Article Details
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Amstrong, K. (2000). The battle for God. (W. G. Tonetto, Ed.) (1st ed.). New York: f Random House, Inc.
Baasyir, A. B. (2008). Penolakan eksekusi mati Trio Mujahid (pernyataan jamaah Ansharu Tauhid Tanggal 30 Dzulhijjah 1429/29 Desember 2008 Tentang Penolakan Eksekusi mati Mujahid Bali).
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum, 2006. Applied Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Gere and Other Late Essays. (C. Emeron & M. Holquit, Eds.) (1st ed.). Texas: University of Texas Press.
BAPPENAS and UNDP. (2016). Measuring Democracy In Indonesia 2009 Indonesia Democracy Index. Jakarta.
Berita Satu. (2014). Menolak ISIS, Anggota JAT Bentuk Jemaah Baru. Retrieved August 13, 2018, from http://www.beritasatu.com/aktualitas/202030-menolak-isis-anggota-jat-bentuk-jamaah-baru.html
BPS. (2017). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI) Menurut Indikator, 2009-2016. Retrieved August 15, 2018, from https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2017/12/21/1276/indeks-demokrasi-indonesia-idi-menurut-indikator-2009-2016.html
Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age : Economy, Society And Culture Volume II, The Power of Identity (1st ed.). Blackwell: Oxford University Press.
Crenshaw, M. (2011). Explaining Terrorism: Causes, Processes and Consequences. London: Routledge.
Edley, N. (2001). Unravelling social constructionism. Theory & Psychology, 11(3), 433–441.
Eidelson, R. ., & Eidelson, J. . (2003). Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist, 58(3), 182–192.
Esposito, J. L. (1988). ISLAM : The Straight Path (3rd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Language in social life series. https://doi.org/10.2307/329335
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fox, J. (2000). Is Islam more conflict prone than other religions?: A cross-sectional study of ethnoreligious conflict. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 6(2), 1–23.
Gaffar, A. (1996). Politik Indonesia Menuju Transisi Demokrasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Galamas, F. (2015). Terrorism In Indonesia: An Overview, in “The militant groups of radical ideology and violent nature series area: Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia” (No. 4).
Gergen, K. J. (1985). The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266
Haqqani, H. (2013). Islamists and Democracy: Cautions from Pakistan. Journal of Democracy, 24(2).
Harrison, C. (2018). Leadership Theory and Research:A Critical pproach to New and Existing Paradigms. Hamilton, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Williamson, W. P. (2005). The Psychology of Religious Fundamentalism. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1995). Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga. (Asril Marjohan, Ed.). Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Jäger, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (1st ed.). London: SAGE Publication Inc.
JAT. (2008). Taujih Am Amir Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid (Disampaikan pada Deklarasi Jama’ah Ansharut Tauhid Jakarta, Rabu, 17 Ramadhan 1429 H/17 September 2008M ). Retrieved December 29, 2014, from http://www.ansharuttauhid.com/read/publikasi/139/taujih-am-amir-jamaah-ansharut-tauhid/#sthash.jFxSlnOl.dpuf
JAT. (2014). “Siapakah yang Lebih Baik Din-nya?”, Khutbah Jum’at Edisi 009, tanggal 02 Rajab 1435H. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://ansharuttauhid.com/read/sariyah/444/siapakah-yang-lebih-baik-dinnya-khutbah-jumat-edisi-009/#sthash.CwgiHGMd.dpuf
Kompas. (2018). Vonis Mati untuk Aman Abdurrahman. Retrieved October 29, 2018, from https://megapolitan.kompas.com/jeo/vonis-mati-untuk-aman-abdurrahman
Leeuwen, T. V. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (1st ed., pp. 32–70). London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Leeuwen, T. V. (2008). Discourse and practice: new tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Lestari, N. (2014). Wacana Demokrasi dalam Public Sphere Komunikasi Politik di Organisasi Islam Indonesia (Analisis Wacana Demokrasi di HTI, FPI, Muhammadiyah, dan NU).
Liddle, R. W. (1996). Media Dakwah Scripturalism: One Form of Islamic Political Thought and Action. In M. R. Woodward (Ed.), Toward A New Paradigm: Recent Development in Indonesian Islamic Thought. Tempe-Arizona: Arizona University Press.
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theories of Human Communication (10th ed.). Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.
Mahendra, Y. I. (1999). Modernisme dan Fundamentalisme Dalam Politik Islam, Perbandingan Partai Masyumi (Indonesia) dan Partai Jamaa’at-i-Islami (Pakistan) (1st ed.). Jakarta: Paramadina.
McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Mirabito, Michael M. A., Morgenstern, B. L. (2004). The New Communications Technologies : Applications, Policy, and Impact (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.
Muluk, H., Sumaktoyo, N. G., & Ruth, D. M. (2013). Jihad as justification: National survey evidence of belief in violent jihad as a mediating factor for sacred violence among Muslims in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12002
Muntaha. (2011). JAT Siap Hadapi Isu Pembubaran! Retrieved December 29, 2014, from http://www.ansharuttauhid.com/read/publikasi/275/jat-siap-hadapi-isu-pembubaran/#sthash.qIhXWcgX.dpuf
Pacey, A. (1983). Technology: practice and culture. The Culture of Technology. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 95–129). London: SAGE Publication Inc.
Silberman, I. (2004). Religion as a meaning system: Implications for pastoral care and guidance. In D. Herl M & L. Berman (Eds.), Building bridges over troubled waters: Enhancing pastoral care and guidance (pp. 51–67). Lima, OH: Wyndham Hall Press.
Silberman, I. (2005a). Religion as a meaning-system: Implications for the new millennium. Journalof Social Issues, 61(4).
Silberman, I. (2005b). Religion as a meaning system: Implications for individualand societal well-being. Psychology of Religion Newsletter: American Psychological Association Division, 36(30 (2)), 1–9.
Silberman, I. (2005c). Religious violence, terrorism, and peace. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spiritualit (1st ed., pp. 529–549). New York: The Guilford Press.
Spalek, B. (2014). Community Engagement for Counterterrorism in Britain: An Exploration of the Role of “Connectors” in Countering Takfiri Jihadist Terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2014.941436
Taher, T. (1998). Radikalisme Agama (1st ed.). Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM), IAIN Jakarta.
Tomsa, D. (2016). The Jakarta Terror Attack and its Implications for Indonesian and Regional Security. Singapura.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Critical discourse analysis: new possibilities for scientific research in the mental health area. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 17, 126–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00019.x
Van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Discourse & Communication. Communication, 1, 2005–2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481306072182
Vološinov, V.-N. (1973). Marksizm i filosofija Jazyka / Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. (L. Matejka & I. . Titunik, Eds.). New York & London: Seminar Press, Inc.