Comparations of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques in Predicting the Classification of the Household’s Welfare Status

Article Sidebar

PDF Data Set and Figures
Published: Apr 23, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2019.2040105
Keywords:
classification, data training and testing, k-fold cross-validation, integrated database, supervised machine learning
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 1540
Download : 1036
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

nfn Nofriani
BPS-Statistics of Bengkulu Province

Abstract

Poverty has been a major problem for most countries around the world, including Indonesia. One approach to eradicate poverty is through equitable distribution of social assistance for target households based on Integrated Database of social assistance. This study has compared several well-known supervised machine learning techniques, namely: Naïve Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machines, K-Nearest Neighbor Classification, C4.5 Algorithm, and Random Forest Algorithm to predict household welfare status classification by using an Integrated Database as a study case. The main objective of this study was to choose the best-supervised machine learning approach in predicting the classification of household’s welfare status based on attributes in the Integrated Database. The results showed that the Random Forest Algorithm was the best.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): April 2019
Section
Informatics

The proposed policy for journals that offer open access

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

References

Anyanwu, M. N., & Shiva, S. G. (2009) Comparative Analysis of Serial Decision Tree Classification Algorithms. International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), 3(3), 230-240.

Brownlee, J. (2016). Supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms. Machine Learning Mastery, 16(03). Retrieved from https://machinelearningmastery.com/supervised-and-unsupervised-machine-learning-algorithms/.

Chan, J. C. W., & Paelinckx, D. (2008). Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(6), 2999-3011.

Chauhan, H., & Chauhan, A. (2014). Evaluating Performance of Decision Tree Algorithms 1. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, 4(4), 1-2.

Defiyanti, S., & Pardede, D. L. (2010). Perbandingan kinerja Algoritma ID3 dan C4. 5 dalam klasifikasi spam-mail. Skripsi Program Studi Sistem Komputer. Depok: Universitas Gunadarma.

Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (1995). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Developers. Classification: Precision and Recall. Machine Learning Crash Course. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://developers. google.com/machine-learning/crash-course/ classification/precision-and-recall.

Google Developers. Classification: ROC and AUC. Machine Learning Crash Course. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/crash-course/classification/roc-and-auc.

Gorunescu, F. (2011). Data Mining: Concepts, models and techniques (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.

Hastuti, K. (2012). Analisis komparasi algoritma klasifikasi data mining untuk prediksi mahasiswa non aktif. Semantik, 2(1), 241-249. Retrieved from http://publikasi.dinus.ac.id/index.php/semantik/article/view/132

Iskandar, D., & Suprapto, Y. K. (2013). Perbandingan akurasi klasifikasi tingkat kemiskinan antara algoritma C4. 5 dan Naïve Bayes Clasifier. JAVA Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 11(1).

ames, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2017). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R (Springer Text in Statistics). Springer.

Janardhanan, P., & Sabika, F. (2015). Effectiveness of Support Vector Machines in Medical Data Mining. Journal of Communications Software and Systems, 11(1), 25-30.

Karyadiputra, E. (2016). Analisis Algoritma Naive Bayes Untuk Klasifikasi Status Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga Keluarga Binaan Sosial. Technologia: Jurnal Ilmiah, 7(4), 199-208.

Kataria, A., & Singh, M. D. (2013). A review of data classification using k-nearest neighbor algorithm. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(6), 354-360.

Kaur, G., & Oberai, E. N. (2014). A review article on Naive Bayes classifier with various smoothing techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 3(10), 864-868.

Kini, M.M., Devi, S.H., G Desai, P., Chiplunkar, N. (2015). Text Mining Approach to Classify Technical Research Documents using Naive Bayes. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(7).

Li, M., Ma, L., Blaschke, T., Cheng, L., & Tiede, D. (2016). A systematic comparison of different object-based classification techniques using high spatial resolution imagery in agricultural environments. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 49, 87-98.

Luque, I. F., Aguilar, F. J., Álvarez, M. F., & Aguilar, M. Á. (2013). Non-parametric object-based approaches to carry out ISA classification from archival aerial orthoimages. IEEE Journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, 6(4), 2058-2071.

Mitchell, R. S., Michalski, J. G., & Carbonell, T. M. (2013). An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Berlin: Springer

Murphy, K. P. (2006). Naive bayes classifiers. University of British Columbia, 18, 60.

Noviyanto, H. (2015). Pengklasifikasian Laman Web Berdasarkan Genre Menggunakan URL Feature. Seminar nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi.

Podgorelec, V., Kokol, P., Stiglic, B., & Rozman, I. (2002). Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine. Journal of medical systems, 26(5), 445-463.

Portugal, I., Alencar, P., & Cowan, D. (2018). The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 97, 205-227.

Quinlan, J.R. (1986). Induction of Decision Trees. Machine Learning, 81-106. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

TNP2K. Tentang Basis Data Terpadu. Retrieved September 24, 2018 from http://bdt.tnp2k.go.id/tentang/.

Visa, S., Ramsay, B., Ralescu, A. L., & Van Der Knaap, E. (2011). Confusion Matrix-based Feature Selection. MAICS, 710, 120-127.

Waikato University. Weka 3: Data Mining Software in Java. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/.

YouTube. (2017). Random Forest - Fun and Easy Machine Learning. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_2LkhMJcfY.

YouTube. (2017). Support Vector Machine (SVM) - Fun and Easy Machine Learning. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6RRHw9uN9o.

YouTube. (2013). Weka Tutorial 28: ROC Curves and AUC (Model Evaluation). Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j97h_-b0gvw.