Measurement of the Maturity Level of Knowledge Management Implementation in Non-Ministry Government Institutions

Article Sidebar

PDF (Indonesian)
Published: Apr 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v6i1.3317
Keywords:
Manajemen Pengetahuan, LPNK, Startegi Pengelolaan Pengetahuan
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 655
Download : 1465
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Yan Andriariza Ambhita Sukma
Kemkominfo
Risna Sari
Jurusan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Depok

Abstract

The government needs knowledge management to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the decision-making process. Knowledge management is one of the supporters in Bureaucratic Reform, which aims to encourage the realization of an effective and efficient organization, to make it happen, government agencies must be prepared to utilize the wealth of knowledge they have, by looking at knowledge management maturity level in government. Based on the research results, the maturity level for all LPNK is 133, which is at level 3 or Introduction, with knowledge management strategies: Formalizing knowledge management through regulations; Establish systems for identifying, creating, storing, sharing, applying and inventorying knowledge; Develop a system of providing incentives for employees; Develop measurement methods and indicators to assess the impact of knowledge contributions and initiatives; Form a cross-functional team to assist each work unit in solving problems encountered; Creating a recovery system to ensure operational activities continue despite critical situations, and Creating a systematic induction process for new employees.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): April 2021
Section
Informatics
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The proposed policy for journals that offer open access

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

References

APO. (2011). Knowledge Management Tools and Techniques Manual, Asia Productivity Organization. www.apo-tokyo.org/publications/files/ind-43-km_tt-2010.pdf.

Becerra, Fernandez, & Sbherwal R. (2010). Knowledge Management System and Process. M.E. Sharpe.

Dayan, R., Heisig, P. & Matos, F. (2017). Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management. 21:2, 308-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2016-0068

Kulkarni, U & St.Louis, R. (2003). “Organizational Self Assessment of Knowledge Management Maturity.” Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp 2542-2551.

Kuriakose, K. K., Raj, B., Murty, S.A.V. Satya., & Swaminathan, P.S.. (2011). Knowledge Management Maturity Model: An Engineering Approach. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12:2 (September).

Liebowitz, J. (2002). The Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer in Organisations. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 10:2, 2-15.

Misra, D. C. (2007). "Ten guiding principles for knowledge management in e-government in developing countries." In first international conference on knowledge management for productivity and competitiveness. New Delhi (IN): National Productivity Council (January 2007).

Naser, S.S.A., Al-Shobaki, M.J., & Amuna, Y.M.A. (2016). Knowledge Management Maturity in Universities and its Impact on Performance Excellence "Comparative study". Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 3:4,4-14.

Obeidat, B., Al-Suradi, M., Masa’deh, R. & Tarhini, A. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on innovation: An empirical study on Jordanian consultancy firms. Management Research Review. 39:10, 1214-1238. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0214

Peraturan Presiden RI Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010 – 2025

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (Menpan RB) Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Manajemen Pengetahuan (Knowledge Management)

Purwasih, N., & Sensuse, D.I. (2014). Pengembangan Strategi Manajemen Pengetahuan untuk Mendukung Pelaksanaan Reformasi Birokrasi: Sebuah Studi Kasus di Kementerian Perindustrian. Journal Of Information Systems, 10 :1, 53-62.

Rachmawati, U.A., & Sensuse, D.I. (2010). Perspektif Knowledge Management pada E-Government di Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2010 (SNATI 2010).

Ramadhani, S., Tjakraatmadja, J.H., & Thoha, N. (2012). Knowledge Management Maturity Level Assessment (Case Study of PT. XYZ). The Indonesian Journal of Business Administration, 1:9, 672-679.

Robinson, H. S., Anumba, C. J., Carrillo, P. M., & Al‐Ghassani, A. M. (2006). STEPS: a knowledge management maturity roadmap for corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12:6, 793–808. doi:10.1108/14637150610710936

Sensuse, D.I. & Rohajawati, S. (2013). Knowledge Management: Workshop APO Framework (Case Study: Ministry of Religious Affairs of Republic Indonesia. International Journal of Computer Sciences Issues, 10:2.

Teah, H.Y., Pee, L.G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Development and Application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model. In The Tenth Pasific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2006). (January 2006).

Tiwana, A. (2002). The knowledge management toolkit : orchestrating IT, strategy, and knowledge platforms. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Yosua, A., & Tjakraatmadja, J.H. (2014). Assessment and Planning of Knowledge Management at PT Dirgantara Indonesia (Persero). In the 6th Indonesia International Conference of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Small Business. (August 2014).

Zhou, Z.& Gao, F. (2007). E-Government and Knowledge Management. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 7:6, 285-289.