Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Penerimaan Mobile Learning Applications (Apps) (Acceptance Factors of Mobile Learning Applications (Apps))
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 729
Download : 786
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mobile learning merupakan proses pembelajaran dengan menggunakan media bergerak berbasis aplikasi. Dalam perspektif komunikasi, mobile learning bukan hanya dilihat sebagai teknologi komunikasi yang digunakan dalam dunia pendidikan melainkan juga teknologi komunikasi yang memperhatikan proses penerimaan pengguna. Dengan menggunakan konsep dari model penerimaan teknologi, mobile learning diteliti melalui kajian literatur. Melalui analisis meta-sintesis, penelitian ini berhasil mengeksplorasi dan mengelompokkan aspek-aspek penerimaan pengguna terhadap teknologi komunikasi berbasis mobile learning applications ke dalam lima kategori, yakni kategori individu, pedagogi, teknologi, sosial, dan manajemen yang perlu didiskusikan lebih lanjut.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Author (s) hold copyrights and retain copyrights of articles if the article is accepted for publishing.
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Public allowed to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) this journal article content.
References
Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. 2019. "Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications." In Education and Information Technologies Vol. 24 Issue 2. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9840-1
Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. 2020. "Analysis the Effect of Different Factors on the Development of Mobile Learning Applications at Different Stages of Usage." IEEE Access 8: 16139–16154. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963333
Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. 2016. "Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance." Journal of Computers in Education 3, no 4: 453–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1
Althunibat, A. 2015. "Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education." Computers in Human Behavior 52: 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046
Bernacki, M. L., Crompton, H., & Greene, J. A. 2020. "Towards convergence of mobile and psychological theories of learning." Contemporary Educational Psychology 60 (November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101828
Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. 2019. "The students’ readiness to engage with mobile learning apps." Interactive Technology and Smart Education 17(1): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2019-0027
Chavoshi, A., & Hamidi, H. 2019. "Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran". Telematics and Informatics 38(May 2018): 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.007
Davis, F. D. 1989. IT Usefulness and Ease of Use. Technology, September: 319–340.
Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models." Management science 35, no. 8: 982-1003.
Guri-Rosenblit, S. 2005. “Distance education” and “e-learning”: Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49(4): 467–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-0040-0
Hao, S., Dennen, V. P., & Mei, L. 2017. "Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users." Educational Technology Research and Development 65, no. 1: 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9465-2
International Telecommunication Union. 2019. Measuring digital development Facts and figures 2019. ITUPublications: 1–15. https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Documents/MediaRelations/IT
U Facts and Figures 2019 - Embargoed 5 November 1200 CET.pdf
Khan, M. S. H., Abdou, B. O., Kettunen, J., & Gregory, S. 2019. "A phenomenographic research study of students’ conceptions of mobile learning: An example from higher education." SAGE Open 9, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861457
Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. 2014. "Effects of Freemium Strategy in the Mobile App Market: An Empirical Study of Google Play." Journal of Management Information Systems 31, no. 3: 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.995564
Milošević, I., Živković, D., Manasijević, D., & Nikolić, D. 2015. "The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning." Computers in Human Behavior 51(PA): 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.041
Mohammadi, H. 2015. "Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran." Computers in Human Behavior 49: 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.006
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. 2011. "E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?" Internet and Higher Education 14, no. 2: 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Rutz, O., Aravindakshan, A., & Rubel, O. 2019. "Measuring and forecasting mobile game app engagement." International Journal of Research in Marketing 36, no. 2: 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.01.002
Sabah, N. M. 2016. "Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption." Computers in Human Behavior 65: 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. 2016. "Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers." Computers in Human Behavior 55: 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002
Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H., Al-Khanjari, Z., & Bourdoucen, H. 2018. "Development of mobile learning application based on consideration of human factors in Oman." Technology in Society 55 (October 2017): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.004
Shuib, L., Shamshirband, S., & Ismail, M. H. 2015. "A review of mobile pervasive learning: Applications and issues." Computers in Human Behavior 46: 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.002
Soad, G. W., Duarte Filho, N. F., & Barbosa, E. F. 2016. Quality evaluation of mobile learning applications. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2016-Novem. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757540
Tamboli, M. A., & Biswas, P. K. 2015. "Mobile Learning Applications’ Acceptance Model (MLAAM)." 2015 International Conference and Workshop on Computing and Communication, IEMCON 2015: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON.2015.7344421
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view." MIS quarterly: 425-478.
Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. 2011. "What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature." Computers and Education 57, no. 4: 2364–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007
Yeap, J. A. L., Ramayah, T., & Soto-Acosta, P. 2016. "Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education." Electronic Markets 26, no. 4: 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0214-x