The Structural, Representation, and Interaction Aspects of Governmental Social Networking Account
Bilah Samping Artikel
Read Counter : 634
Download : 144
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
with the public. In the study, we use public sphere theory proposed by Habermas. Dahlgren developed it further into three dimensions: structural, representation, and interaction. Of two accounts examined, i.e. Solok and Pariaman city administrations’, the three dimensions
of public sphere have not existed. Public relations unit as the department that manages the accounts, still puts social networking accounts as a means of image polishing of the institutions rather than a means to disseminate information to the public. Social networking management that has not been taken as a performance appraisal tools has made social networking accounts as an additional task, although essentially they realise the importance to manage them.
Keywords: Public sphere, Social networks, structural, representation, interaction
Rincian Artikel
Jurnal IPTEK-KOM menggunakan kebijakan akses terbuka. Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:
- Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).
Referensi
Butsch, Richard. Media and Public Sphere. New
York: Palgrave Macmilan, 2007.
Bharata, Addy Sukma and Al Kalam. Ayo Buat
Facebookmu Menarik. Jakarta: PT. Elex
Media Komputindo, 2008.
Boyd, Danah and Ellison, Nicole. “Social Network
Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship”.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
(2008): 210-230.
Crossley, C. and JM. Roberts dalam Crossley, N. &
JM. Roberts (eds.) After Habermas: New
Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Oxford:
Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Dahlgren, L. “The Habermasian Public Sphere:
Taking Difference Seriously?” Theory and
Society 34 (2) (2005): 111-136.
DiMaggio, P. et. al.“Social implications of the
Internet”. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.
, no1, (2001): 307-336.
Entman, Robert M., and Bennett, W. Lance.
Mediated Politics: Communications and the
Future of Democracy. London: Cambridge
University Press, 2001.
Habermas, Jürgen. "Further Reflections On The
Public Sphere" dalam Craig Calhoun (Ed):
Habermas And The Public Sphere. London:
Cambridge, MA & MIT Press, 421-461s,
Jenkins, Henry. "The Cultural Logic Of Media
Convergence" In The International Journal
Of Cultural Studies, Vol 7 (1) (2006): 37.
Kahn, Robert and Douglas Kellner. “New Media
and Internet Activism: From the Battle of
Seattle to Blogging”. New Media and
Society, 6(1) (2004): 87-95.
Kriyantono, Rachmat. Teknik Praktis Riset
Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada
Media Group, 2006.
McQuail, D. McQuail’s Mass Communication
Theory. 5th ed. London: Sage, 2005.
Rasmussen, Terje. “The Internet and the Differentiation
of Public Sphere”. Nordicom Review:
Nordic Research on Media and
Communication, 29(2) (2008): 73-84.
Shirky, Clay. “The Political Power of Social Media:
Technology, The Public Sphere, and Political
Change”. Foreign Affairs (2011): 6.
Urry, J. “Globalization and Citizenship”. Journal of
World-Systems Research, 5(2) (1999): 311-