COMPARISON OF LINEAR AND VECTOR DATA NORMALIZATION TECHNIQUES IN DECISION MAKING FOR LEARNING QUOTA ASSISTANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30818/jitu.4.1.3897Keywords:
Normalization, Linear, Vector, Decision- making, Learning-QuotaAbstract
Data normalization is essential for all kinds of decision-making problems, and a lot of effort has been spent on the development of normalization models in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), but despite all this, there is no definite answer to the question: Which is the most appropriate technique?. This paper compares the popular normalization techniques: Linear Normalization (LN) and Vector Normalization (VN) using VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) Method. The beneficiaries dataset of learning quota was collected of 399 students sample through observation (drive-test measurements and online questionnaires) to obtain information on criteria data including attributes in online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. The ranking results for vector vs linear normalization show how ranking is affected. The difference in the selection of the best alternative (rank) shows that there are differences in vector and linear assessments that are influenced by the max-min criterion value which has an impact on the rank- sum results (benefit/cost). This test clearly shows how important it is to use an appropriate (normalized) representation of the model because there will often be a criterion where "the higher the better" while for others (cost) "the lower the better".
References
S. Panjwani, S. N. Kumar, and L. Ahuja, “Multi-criteria decision making and its applications,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.I1122.0789S419.
P. Chatterjee and S. Chakraborty, “Investigating the effect of normalization norms in flexible manufacturing sytem selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods,”
J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 2014, doi: 10.25103/jestr.073.23.
N. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: Analytical hierarchy process case study,” 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26.
A. B. Pandey, P. B. Nawale, R. R. Patil, S. S. Patil, and V. B. Sawant, “Effect of Normalization Techniques on MEMS Digital Micromirror Selection using MADM Methodology,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag., no. 01, pp. 67–75, 2020, doi: 10.35291/2454-9150.2020.0259.
C. Yue, “Attribute Normalization Approaches to Group Decision-making and Application to Software Reliability Assessment,” Cognit. Comput., 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12559-019-09707-2.
S. H. Zolfani, M. Yazdani, D. Pamucar, and P. Zarate, “A vikor and topsis focused reanalysis of the madm methods based on logarithmic normalization,” Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 2020, doi: 10.22190/FUME191129016Z.
N. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “Data normalisation techniques in decision making: Case study with TOPSIS method,” International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences. 2018, doi: 10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667.
A. Jahan and K. L. Edwards, “A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design,” Materials and Design. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.022.
A. Çelen, “Comparative analysis of normalization procedures in TOPSIS method: With an application to Turkish deposit banking market,” Inform., 2014, doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2014.10.
Kemendikbud, “Peraturan Sekretaris Jenderal Nomor 14 Tahun 2020, tentang Petunjuk Teknis Bantuan Kuota Data Internet Tahun 2020,” Jakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://kuota-belajar.kemdikbud.go.id.
Kemendikbud, “Peraturan Sekretaris Jenderal Nomor 4 Tahun 2021 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyaluran Bantuan Pemerintah Paket Kuota Data Internet Tahun 2021.” 2021, [Online]. Available: https://kuota- belajar.kemdikbud.go.id/.
Kemendibud, “Buku Saku Bantuan Kuota Data Internet 2021.” Kemendikbud, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://kuota-belajar.kemdikbud.go.id.
E. Budiman, “Mobile Data Usage on Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 4–17, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i19.17499.
E. Budiman, N. Dengen, Haviluddin, and W. Indrawan, “Integrated multi criteria decision making for a destitute problem,” in 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), 2017, pp. 342–347, doi: 10.1109/ICSITech.2017.8257136.
P. D. Sugiono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif.pdf,” Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
