A NETWORK PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF WEBRTC AND SIP AUDIO AND VIDEO COMMUNICA TIONS

Authors

  • Sulthan Kharisma Akmal Telkom University
  • Aji Gautama Putrada Telkom University
  • Febri Dawani Telkom University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30818/jitu.4.1.3939

Keywords:

WebRTC, SIP, Video Communication, Codec, Network Performance

Abstract

Multimedia services are one of the internet needs with high data traffic network count since 2019. Two of the multimedia services, Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC) and Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), have been widely used in applications for conducting video conferencing. The main objective of this research is to analyze network performance by an application with a client-server for audio and video communications developed with WebRTC and SIP protocols. The SIP system uses the FreePBX server, and the softphone application uses Bria. Whereas WebRTC uses JavaScript with servers on Ubuntu using Node.js. The analysis application uses a star topology and runs on a local network using Wi-Fi. After testing, the results show that the throughput, jitter, and packet loss of WebRTC are better than SIP. This result is caused by several factors including the type of codec, the type of platform, and the way of signaling and routing of each protocol.

Author Biographies

  • Sulthan Kharisma Akmal, Telkom University
    Bachelor of Informatics at Telkom University.
  • Aji Gautama Putrada, Telkom University
    Lecturer at the Faculty of Informatics at Telkom University.
  • Febri Dawani, Telkom University
    Lecturer at the Faculty of Informatics at Telkom University.

References

R. K. Panta, “Mobile Video Delivery: Challenges and Opportunities,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 64–67, 2015.

Nayyef, Zinah & Amer, Sarah & Hussain, (2019). Peer to Peer Multimedia Real-Time Communication System based on WebRTC Technology. International Journal for the History of Engineering &Technology. 2.9. 125-130.

Suciu G., Anwar M., Virtualized Video conferencing for eLearning, 14th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 19-20, 2018.

K. K. Tam and H. L. Goh. Session initiation protocol. In 2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2002. IEEE ICIT ’02., volume 2, pages 1310–1314 vol.2, 2002.

G. Suciu, S. Stefanescu, C. Beceanu, and M. Ceaparu. Webrtc role in real-time communication and video conferencing. In 2020 Global Internet of Things Summit

(GIoTS), pages 1–6, 2020.

Hardik Tandel and Dr. Parag Rughani. Forensic analysis

of asterisk-freepbx based voip server. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 6:166, 06 2018.

Gaous Afrizal et al. Impact of random and burst packet loss on voice codec g. 711, g. 722, g. 729, amr-nb, amr- wb. In 2018 4th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2018.

TP Fowdur, N Ramkorun, and PK Chiniah. Performance analysis of webrtc and sip-based audio and video communication systems. SN Computer Science, 1(6):1– 22, 2020.

Navrattan Parmar and Virender Ranga. Performance analysis of webrtc and sip for video conferencing. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng.(IJITEE), 8(9S):679–686, 2019.

Seeling, Patrick & Fitzek, Frank & Ertli, Gergö & Reisslein, Martin & Pulipaka, Akshay. (2010). Video network traffic and quality comparison of VP8 and H.264 SVC. 10.1145/1878022.1878031.

Wulandari, Rika. "Analisis Qos (Quality of Service) Pada Jaringan Internet (Studi Kasus : Upt Loka Uji Teknik Penambangan Jampang Kulon – Lipi)." Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016, doi:10.28932/jutisi.v2i2.454.

Yousef Sharrab and Nabil Sarhan. Detailed comparative analysis of vp8 and h.264. pages 133–140, 12 2012.

Cahyadi, Seto Ayom et al. “Analisis Quality Of Service (QoS) Pada Jaringan Lokal Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Menggunakan GNS3.” (2013).

Pavel Segec, Peter Palúch, Jozef Papán, and Milan Kubina. The integration of webrtc and sip: way of enhancing real-time, interactive multimedia communication. In 2014 IEEE 12th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pages 437–442. IEEE, 2014.

G. Suciu, S. Stefanescu, C. Beceanu and M. Ceaparu, "WebRTC role in real-time communication and video conferencing," 2020 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), Dublin, Ireland, 2020, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/GIOTS49054.2020.9119656.

P. J. Braun, P. Ekler and F. H. P. Fitzek, "Demonstration of a P2P assisted video streaming with WebRTC and network coding," 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, 2017, pp. 576-577, doi: 10.1109/CCNC.2017.7983173.

Tiamiyu O.A & Garuba A.O. (2019). On The Design And Implementation Of Peer-to-Peer Communication Using WebRTC. Vol. 44, No 1, Aug. 2019.

Y. dkk, “Metoda Real Time Flow Measurement (RTFM) untuk Monitoring QoS di Jaringan NGN,” dalam Prosiding 14 Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi untuk Indonesia 3 - 6 Mei 2006 Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung,2006.

Adauto Cavalcante Menezes, Toniclay Andrade Nogueira, Edward David Moreno Ordonez, and Admilson

de Ribamar Lima Ribeiro. An approach to the performance and efficiency power analysis on embedded devices using asterisk. 2018.

Li Yan. Research and design of rich media communication system based on webrtc and sip. Master’s thesis, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2018

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

A NETWORK PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF WEBRTC AND SIP AUDIO AND VIDEO COMMUNICA TIONS. (2021). Journal of Information Technology and Its Utilization, 4(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.30818/jitu.4.1.3939