Communication of Organizations in Organizations Change’s Phenomenon in Research and Development Institution
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
When the change has become a necessity for organizational life and it is important to increase the productivity and role of research institutions, it must be done. Change as a necessity needs to be pursued and carried out with a mature strategy to be able to minimize resistance and material and immaterial costs. The immaterial aspect that plays a very important role and as a key is an organizational communication that needs to be prepared as a strategy that can have an extraordinary influence on the success of the organizational change. But what about when these changes are not optimally communicated? The purpose of this study is to examine the dynamics of the phenomenon of organizational communication dynamics in a research institution that carries out organizational change. This research has benefits because it can provide a critical picture and analysis of organizational change in terms of organizational communication dynamics in research institutions. This research method uses a qualitative phenomenological approach to capture the image meaning of a series of events in the process of organizational change in research institutions from the aspect of organizational communication. The phenomenon of organizational change began with various rejections from various levels of employees both researchers and non-researchers who demanded openness and certainty and maintain the honor of the institution as a research institution. The demand for information disclosure is a reflection of the inability of the organization's management to communicate the planned change strategy to cause resistance to the process.
Rincian Artikel
Kebijakan yang diajukan untuk jurnal yang menawarkan akses terbuka
Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:- Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).
Referensi
Baauchamp, R., Heidari-Robinson S., & Heywood, S. (2016). Reorganization Withaout Tears. McKinsey Quarterly. Diunduh pada 20 Mei 2019, di link: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reorganization-without-tears
Cacciottolo, K. (2015). Defining organizational communication. European Scientific Journal, 11(20). 79-87.
Clampitt, P.G. (2017). Communication for Managerial Effectiveness: Challenges, Strategies, Solutions, Sixth Edition. SAGE: USA.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research Design: qualitative, Quantitaive (4th ed), and Mixed Methods Approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
Cresswell, J.W., & Brown, M.L. (1992). How chairpersons enhance faculty research: a graounded theory study. Review of Higer Education, 16(1), 41-62.
Cumming.T. G., & Worley, C.G.(2005). Organizational Development and Change. Thomson, South-Western: USA.
Davis, K. (1953). A method of studying communication pattern in organization. Personal Psychology, 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1953.tb01499.x
Goldhaber, G.M. (1986). Organizational Communication. Iowa Wm. Brown Publisher.
Hall, R. H. (1987). Organisations: Structures, Processes & Outcomes, Uk:Prentice-Hall International Inc.
Jensen, M,T. (2003). Organizational Communication – A Review. Research and Development Report, 1. Agderforskning: Norway
Jones, G. R. (2007). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Kohler, J.W. Anatol, K.W.E, & Applbaum, R.L.(1981). Organizational Communication: Behvioral Perspective. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winstons.
Kotter, J. (1995). Leading Changes: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. IEEE Engineering Management Review 37(3). DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2009.5235501.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoritical Papers, 1st ed. Harper: New York.
Muhammad, A. (2011). Komunikasi Organisasi. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta
Olekalns, M., Putnam, L.L., Weinghart, L.R., & Metcalf, L. (2008). Communinacion processes and conflict management. In C.K.W. De Dreu & M.J. Gelfand (Eds), The organizational frontiers series. The Psychology Of Conflict And Conflict Management In Organizations. 81-114, Taylor & Francis Group: New York.
Pace, R.W., & Faules, D.F. (2002). Organizational Communication. New Jersey: Pretice Hall.
Romadona, M.R., & Setiawan, S. (2019). Impact of communication in organization to readiness for change: Case of research organization X. SU-AFBE 2018, Proceeding of the 1st Sampoerna University-AFBE International Conference. DOI: 10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286327
Romadona, M. R.(2018). The Role of Organization-Based Self-esteem and Organizational Communication Toward Job Involvement in Research Center Organization. Pekommas, 3(2), 191-202.
Romadona, M.R. (2017). The role pf self-efficacy and communication skill of researchers to organizational climate at research center X. Pekommas, 2 (1), 55-64.
Lamgkah Perubahan Menurut John Kotter. Diunduh dari laman https://ilmumanajemenindustri.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/8-Langkah-Perubahan-menurut-John-Kotter.jpg?x18153
Ruber, B.D. (1988). Communication and Human Behavior. New York: Macmilland Publishing Company.
Seiler, W.J. (1988). Introduction to Speech Communication. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.