Kontestasi Frame Surat Kabar National dalam Liputan “Aksi Bela Islam”
Bilah Samping Artikel
Read Counter : 793
Download : 386
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Abstrak – Tulisan ini membahas bagaimana surat kabar harian membingkai realitas aksi umat islam. Aksi tersebut menarik pemberitaan media massa nasional dan internasional karena ia melibatkan muslim dalam jumlah besar, memiliki kompleksitas persoalan (hukum, politik, agama) dan kepentingan, yaitu kontestasi pemilihan gubernur Jakarta. Media terlibat dalam kompleksitas tersebut dan digunakan sebagai instrumen, yaitu politk pemberitaan atau framing. Kami bertujuan menemukan bingkai surat kabar harian dengan melakukan analisis isi kualitatif terhadap surat kabar nasional: Kompas, Republika, Suara Pembaruan, dan Media Indonesia selama periode November 2016. Dengan menganalisis tajuk rencana mereka, kami menemukan bahwa, frame surat kabar harian di Indonesia berbeda satu sama lain. Frame surat kabar Republika dan Suara Pembaruan bahkan bertentangan. Republika menganggap aksi umat Islam sebagai respon untuk memperoleh keadilan dan hak asasi karena penistaan agama mereka (masalah hukum). Suara Pembaruan melihat aksi sebagai masalah politik (pemilihan gubernur DKI Jakarta) yang menggunakan isu agama. Media Indonesia melihat aksi juga sebagai masalah politik. Kompas melihat aksi sebagai persoalan agama dan politik. Kami menyimpulkan bahwa walaupun diharapkan tidak memihak sebagai bagian dari nilai-nilai demokrasi, media massa tetap saja memihak dalam isu yang krusial seperti agama. Penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman bahwa media umum bisa menjadi media partisan pada konteks tertentu.
Kata Kunci: Frame, Surat Kabar, Aksi Bela Islam
Abstract – This article deals with how daily newspapers of Indonesia frame reality of the collective action of Muslims. That action becomes a magnet for national and international mass media because involving a large number of Muslim, and has a problem complexity (legal, politic, religion) and political interests (contestation for Jakarta governor). Media get involved in that complexity because they are harnessed as a political instrument, by conducting framing. We aim to find daily newspaper frame by analyzing their qualitative content. Those newspapers are Kompas, Republika, Suara pembaruan, and Media Indonesia during November 2016. By analyzing their editorials, we find that their frames regarding Muslim collective action are different to each other. Even, frames of Republika and Suara Pembaruan are contested. Republika regards the muslin action as a respond to get justice and basic right because of their religion blasphemy. Republika considers it as a legal issue. Suara Pembaruan views the muslin action as a political issue (gubernatorial election of DKI Jakarta), which make use of religion issue. Media Indonesia sees the action as a political issue as well. Kompas regards it as political and religion issue. We conclude that although expected to be impartial –as part of democratic values, mass media keep in-partiality in crucial issues e.g., religion. This study gives our understanding that mass media can be partial in the certain contexts.
Keywords: frame, newspapers, aksi bela islam.Rincian Artikel
Kebijakan yang diajukan untuk jurnal yang menawarkan akses terbuka
Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:- Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).
Referensi
Alper, M. (2014). War on Instagram: Framing conflict photojournalism with mobile photography apps. New Media & Society, 16(8), 1233–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813504265
Behar, R. (2001). The Year of Laying Cable Dangerously Two men from opposite worlds, both caught in the Clinton scandals, forge a troubled partnership in Jakarta. Retrieved December 18, 2016, from archive.fortune.com/magazines/ fortune/fortune_archive/2001/07/23/307376/index.htm?iid=sr-link1.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. (M. Raymond, Gino., Adamson, Ed.) (1st ed.). Cambridge-UK: Polity Press.
Channel Berita Terkini. (2016). Ini Pidato Lengkap Ahok di Kepulauan Seribu Yang Menyinggung Ayat Al Maidah 51. Indonesia.
D’Angelo, P. (2012). Studying Framing in Political Communication with an Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426332
Durham, F. S. (1998). News frames as social narratives: TWA flight 800. , 48(4), 100-117. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02772.x.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
Fairhurst, G. T. (2011). Leadership and the power of framing. Executive Forum, (Summer), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.479
Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative Content Analysis. Advances in Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7
Gitlin, T. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. California: University of California Press.
GNPF. (2017). Anak-Anak dan Aksi 212.
Graneheim, U. ., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Hamad, I. (2004). Konstruksi Realitas Politik: Sebuah Studi Critical Discourse Analysis terhadap Berita-berita Politik (1st ed.). Jakarta: Granit.
Hanson, E. C. (1995). Framing The World News: The Times of India in Changing Times. Political Communication, 12(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1995.9963085.
Harian Kompas. (2016a, November 5). Biarlah Hukum Bicara.
Harian Kompas. (2016b, November 17). Tetaplah di Jalur Hukum.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016a, November 1). Persatuan Bangsa Lebih Penting.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016b, November 2). Kepada Hukum Kita Berserah.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016c, November 3). Menyoal Urgensi Demonstrasi.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016d, November 5). Setelah Unjuk Rasa Giliran Hukum Bicara.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016e, November 7). Penegakan Hukum untuk Semua.
Harian Media Indonesia. (2016f, November 28). Ancaman IS.
Harian Republika. (2016, November 4). Tenang dan Jaga Persatuan.
Harian Republika. (2016, November 5). Aksi Damai Bermartabat.
Harian Republika. (2016, November 7). Tegakkan Hukum Untuk Semua.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016a, November 3). Jaga Keamanan Jakarta.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016b, November 7). Jangan Biarkan Garuda Tercabik.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016c, November 21). Merayakan Kebhinekaan.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016d, November 21). Ungkap Kelompok Makar.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016e, November 22). Kontestasi Pilgub Tanpa Isu SARA.
Harian Suara Pembaruan. (2016f, November 22). Tak Perlu Unjuk Rasa Susulan.
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture and Society, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835
Herman, Edward S., and N. C. (2010). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of The Mass Media. London: Random House.
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society. Nordicom Review, 29, 105–134. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155363
Hsieh, H.-F. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kieran, M. (1997). New reporting and the ideological presumption. Journal of Communication, 47, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02707.x
Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2017). Calon Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur DKI Jakarta Tahun 2017. Retrieved January 4, 2017, from http://kpujakarta.go.id
Lim, M. (2011). Democratization & Corporatization of Media In Indonesia. Arizona: Participatory Media Lab.
Lim, M. (2012). The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia. Tempe-Arizona.
Lippman, W. (1992). Stereotypes, Public Opinion, and The Press. In E. D. Cohen (Ed.), Philosophical Issues In Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macnamara, J. (2006). Media Content Analysis: Its Uses; Benefits and Best Practice Methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.3712
Maher, T. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, 83–94.
Marying, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Research, 1(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7
Matthes, J. (2012). Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426324
McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). London: Sage Publication Ltd.
Menkominfo. Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tahun 2014 Tentang Penanganan Situs Internet Bermuatan Negatif (2014). Jakarta.
Meyer, T. (2002). Demokrasi Sebuah Pengantar Untuk Penerapan. Jakarta: D’print Communication.
Monge, Peter R., Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mubarok. (2006). Analisis Sikap Media Dalam Pemberitaan Sengketa Blok Ambalat (Analisis Framing Harian Kompas dan Republika). Universitas Diponegoro.
MUI. (2017). Pendapat dan Sikap Keagamaan MUI terkait Pernyataan Basuki Tjahaja Purnama.
Njoku, C. C., & Hamid, H. A. (2014). Religion in a secular state and state religion in practice: Assessing religious influence, tolerance, and national stability in Nigeria and Malaysia. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13(39), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085347
Nugroho, Yanuar., dkk. (2012). Mapping the landscape of the media industry In contemporary Indonesia. Jakarta.
Oetama, J. (2001). Memperbincangkan Etika Bisnis. In J. Pour (Ed.), Dunia Usaha dan Etika Bisnis. Jakarta: Kompas.
Papacharissi, Zizi., Oliveira, M. de F. (2008). News Frames Terrorism: A Comparative Analysis of Frames Employed in Terrorism Coverage in U.S. and U.K. Newspapers. The International Journal of Press & Politics, 13(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161207312676
Rogers, E. M. (1994). History of Communication Study: Biographical Approach. New York: Free Press.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170–183). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Smith, C. P. (2000). Content Analysis and Narrative Analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of Content Analysis. Retrieved December 17, 2016, from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Structure of an editorial. (2017).
Sudibyo, Agus., Patria, N. (2013). The Television Industry in Post-authoritarian Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2012.757434.
Suryadinata, L. (1995). Prominent Indonesian Chinese: Biographical Sketches (4th ed.). Singapura: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Suyatno. (2004). Menjelajah Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Liebe Book.
Tankard, J. (2008). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In G. Reese SD, Gandy OH (Ed.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (pp. 95–105). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wong, K. (2004). Asian-Based Development Journalism and Political Elections Press Coverage of the 1999 General Elections in Malaysia. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 66(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204039940
Yang, L. F., & Ishak, S. A. (2012). Framing interethnic conflict in Malaysia: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage on the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf). International Journal of Communication, 6(1), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813482310
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative Analysis of Content. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, 421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20661