Delegitimasi Wacana Kekerasan Seksual Komnas Perempuan di Media Sosial oleh Warganet pada Kasus Ferdy Sambo
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 207
Download : 314
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of netizens’ negative responses towards the statement by Komnas Perempuan regarding the alleged sexual violence experienced by Ferdy Sambo's wife, as a form of delegitimation. Legitimation is built by discursive practice, and hence can be delegitimated by mechanisms of opposition. Delegitimation is carried out through three components of discursive legitimation, namely: (i) authority, (ii) rationality and (iii) symbolic. As a research method, a case study of citizens’ Twitter posts (tweets) from 1-10 September 2022 were analyzed using Intelligent Socio Analytic (ISA), a social media big data extraction tool. The results show in terms of authority, discursive delegitimation is carried out by positioning Komnas Perempuan to be supporting the narrative of the Police. In the aspect of rationality, Komnas Perempuan's discourse is seen as protecting the perpetrators of the murder instead of siding with the victim’s families. As for symbolic narratives, Komnas Perempuan is equated with other institutions that can be bribed and are weak in the face of power. In the digital era, discursive delegitimation can strengthen or weaken the digital authority of the public.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Author (s) hold copyrights and retain copyrights of articles if the article is accepted for publishing.
- The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Public allowed to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) this journal article content.
References
Alfitri. (2020). Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia. In Studia Islamika (Vol. A27, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408
Almanssori, S., & Stanley, M. (2022). Public pedagogy on sexual violence: A feminist discourse analysis of YouTube vlogs after #MeToo. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2021.1895382
Amer, M. M. (2009). “Telling-it-like-it-is”: The delegitimation of the second Palestinian Intifada in Thomas Friedman’s discourse. Discourse and Society, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508097093
Björkvall, A., & Höög, C. N. (2019). Legitimation of value practices, value texts, and core values at public authorities. Discourse and Communication, 13(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319842457
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context and Media, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2021). What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns. Discourse and Society, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977215
Budd, K., Kelsey, D., Mueller, F., & Whittle, A. (2019). Metaphor, morality and legitimacy: A critical discourse analysis of the media framing of the payday loan industry. Organization, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418812569
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Influence of media on the political conversation on Twitter: Activity, popularity, and authority in the digital debate in Spain. In Icono14 (Vol. 18, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.7195/RI14.V18I1.1527
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). Influencers in the political conversation on twitter: Identifying digital authority with big data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052851
Chinnasamy, S., & Tahrim, A. M. (2019). New media and social influencer engagement on lifestyle and political content. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5274.098319
Chung, W., & Zeng, D. (2020). Dissecting emotion and user influence in social media communities: An interaction modeling approach. Information and Management, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.008
D. Clark, M. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture.” Communication and the Public, 5(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
Deumert, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. In Sociolinguistics and Mobile Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816656341a
Duncombe, C. (2019). The Politics of Twitter: Emotions and the Power of Social Media. International Political Sociology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz013
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
Franzosi, R. (2021). What’s in a text? Bridging the gap between quality and quantity in the digital era. Quality and Quantity, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01067-6
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media and Society, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646
Glozer, S., Caruana, R., & Hibbert, S. A. (2019). The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue. Organization Studies, 40(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617751006
Gunnarsson, L. (2018). “Excuse Me, But Are You Raping Me Now?” Discourse and Experience in (the Grey Areas of) Sexual Violence. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2017.1395359
Gustafsson, N., & Weinryb, N. (2020). The populist allure of social media activism: Individualized charismatic authority. Organization, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419828565
Haugaard, M. (2018). What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17723737
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media.
Hutchinson, J. (2021). Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media. Information Communication and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1629612
Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2014). Assessing the validity of discourse analysis: transdisciplinary convergence. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9567-7
Katre, P. D. (2019). NLP based text analytics and visualization of political speeches. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6503.098319
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociological Quarterly, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Kurniawan, H. (2022). Komnas HAM: Pembunuhan Brigadir J Bukan Pelanggaran HAM Berat.
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2021). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Manokha, I. (2009). Foucault’s concept of power and the global discourse of human rights. Global Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820903198792
Miichi, K. (2020). Post-Islamism Revisited: The Response of Indonesia’s Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) to Gender-Related Issues. Muslim World, 110(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12367
Mills, K. A. (2018). What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117743465
Motion, J. (2005). Participative public relations: Power to the people or legitimacy for government discourse? Public Relations Review, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.009
Noer, K. U., Chadijah, S., & Rudiatin, E. (2021). There is no trustable data: the state and data accuracy of violence against women in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552
Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More Trust in Fewer Followers: Diverging Effects of Popularity Metrics and Green Orientation Social Media Influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.002
Poell, T. (2019). Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest. Social Movement Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287
Prasetia, F. A. (2022). Langkah Polri Tak Tahan Putri Candrawathi Sesuai Rekomendasi Komnas Perempuan.
Riabov, O. (2020). The Symbol of the Motherland in the Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power in Contemporary Russia. Nationalities Papers, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.14
Rivers, D. J., & Ross, A. S. (2020). Authority (de)legitimation in the border wall Twitter discourse of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19105.riv
Ron, J., Pandya, A., & Crow, D. (2016). Universal values, foreign money: funding local human rights organizations in the global south. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1095780
Sadat, A., & Ilham, R. F. (2022). Mahfud MD Sebut Komnas HAM Masih Terjebak Dalam Skenario Sambo.
Singh, N. K., Tomar, D. S., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2020). Sentiment analysis: a review and comparative analysis over social media. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0862-8
St-Onge, C., Young, M., Eva, K. W., & Hodges, B. (2017). Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3
Sunderland, J. (2020). Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. Open Linguistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0022
Syamili, C., & Rekha, R. V. (2021). Twitter and social movement: An analysis of tweets in response to the #metoo challenge. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/IJMIL.2021.1.231
Tiidenberg, K., & Whelan, A. (2019). “Not like that, not for that, not by them”: social media affordances of critique. Communication and Critical/ Cultural Studies, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1624797
Vaara, E. (2014). Struggles over legitimacy in the Eurozone crisis: Discursive legitimation strategies and their ideological underpinnings. Discourse and Society, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Velasco, J. C. (2021). You are cancelled: Virtual collective consciousness and the emergence of cancel culture as ideological purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21659/RUPKATHA.V12N5.RIOC1S21N2
Yaǧcioǧlu, S., & Cem-Deǧer, A. (2001). Logos or mythos: (de)legitimation strategies in confrontational discourses of sociocultural ethos. Discourse and Society, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006005
Ye, Y., Xu, P., & Zhang, M. (2017). Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.021
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods Sixth Edition. In Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Sage Publication, Inc.
Yu, Y. (2022). Perpetuating and/or resisting the “leftover” myth? The use of (de)legitimation strategies in the Chinese English-language news media. Feminist Media Studies, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1837909