Delegitimation of Komnas Perempuan's Discourse on Sexual Violence in the Ferdy's Sambo Case
Bilah Samping Artikel
Read Counter : 207
Download : 314
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Artikel ini melihat fenomena "hujatan" warganet atas pernyataan Komnas Perempuan tentang dugaan kekerasan seksual yang dialami istri Ferdy Sambo sebagai bentuk delegitimasi melalui wacana. Hal ini mengacu pada konsep legitimasi sebagai praktif diskursif yang memungkinkan mengalami delegitimasi melalui mekanisme opisisi. Delegitimasi dilakukan melalui tiga komponen pembentuk legitimasi wacana antara lain aspek otoritas, rasionalitas dan simbolik. Metode penelitian adalah studi kasus data postingan warganet di Twitter terkait Komnas Perempuan menggunakan alat esktrasi big data media sosial Intelligent Socio Analytic (ISA) sepanjang 1-10 September 2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukan delegitimasi wacana pada dimensi otoritas dilakukan dengan memposisikan Komnas Perempuan mendukung narasi Polisi. Pada dimensi rasionalitas, wacana Komnas Perempuan disebut melindungi pelaku pembunuhan dan tidak berpihak pada keluarga korban. Sementara, pada dimensi simbolik yakni dengan menyebut Komnas Perempuan sama dengan lembaga lain yang lemah menghadapi kekuasaan dan bisa disuap. Di era digital, deligitimasi wacana dapat menjadi bagian dari penguatan maupun pelemahan otoritas digital publik.
Kata kunci: Delegitimasi, Diskursus Legitimasi, Kekerasan Seksual, Big Data Analytic, Ferdy Sambo
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal IPTEK-KOM menggunakan kebijakan akses terbuka. Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:
- Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
- Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
- Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).
Referensi
Alfitri. (2020). Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia. In Studia Islamika (Vol. A27, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408
Almanssori, S., & Stanley, M. (2022). Public pedagogy on sexual violence: A feminist discourse analysis of YouTube vlogs after #MeToo. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2021.1895382
Amer, M. M. (2009). “Telling-it-like-it-is”: The delegitimation of the second Palestinian Intifada in Thomas Friedman’s discourse. Discourse and Society, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508097093
Björkvall, A., & Höög, C. N. (2019). Legitimation of value practices, value texts, and core values at public authorities. Discourse and Communication, 13(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319842457
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context and Media, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2021). What gets lost in Twitter ‘cancel culture’ hashtags? Calling out racists reveals some limitations of social justice campaigns. Discourse and Society, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977215
Budd, K., Kelsey, D., Mueller, F., & Whittle, A. (2019). Metaphor, morality and legitimacy: A critical discourse analysis of the media framing of the payday loan industry. Organization, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418812569
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Influence of media on the political conversation on Twitter: Activity, popularity, and authority in the digital debate in Spain. In Icono14 (Vol. 18, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.7195/RI14.V18I1.1527
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2021). Influencers in the political conversation on twitter: Identifying digital authority with big data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052851
Chinnasamy, S., & Tahrim, A. M. (2019). New media and social influencer engagement on lifestyle and political content. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5274.098319
Chung, W., & Zeng, D. (2020). Dissecting emotion and user influence in social media communities: An interaction modeling approach. Information and Management, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.008
D. Clark, M. (2020). DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture.” Communication and the Public, 5(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
Deumert, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. In Sociolinguistics and Mobile Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816656341a
Duncombe, C. (2019). The Politics of Twitter: Emotions and the Power of Social Media. International Political Sociology, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olz013
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
Franzosi, R. (2021). What’s in a text? Bridging the gap between quality and quantity in the digital era. Quality and Quantity, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01067-6
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media and Society, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646
Glozer, S., Caruana, R., & Hibbert, S. A. (2019). The Never-Ending Story: Discursive Legitimation in Social Media Dialogue. Organization Studies, 40(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617751006
Gunnarsson, L. (2018). “Excuse Me, But Are You Raping Me Now?” Discourse and Experience in (the Grey Areas of) Sexual Violence. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2017.1395359
Gustafsson, N., & Weinryb, N. (2020). The populist allure of social media activism: Individualized charismatic authority. Organization, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419828565
Haugaard, M. (2018). What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17723737
Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media.
Hutchinson, J. (2021). Micro-platformization for digital activism on social media. Information Communication and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1629612
Jaipal-Jamani, K. (2014). Assessing the validity of discourse analysis: transdisciplinary convergence. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9567-7
Katre, P. D. (2019). NLP based text analytics and visualization of political speeches. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6503.098319
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. Sociological Quarterly, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Kurniawan, H. (2022). Komnas HAM: Pembunuhan Brigadir J Bukan Pelanggaran HAM Berat.
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2021). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Manokha, I. (2009). Foucault’s concept of power and the global discourse of human rights. Global Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820903198792
Miichi, K. (2020). Post-Islamism Revisited: The Response of Indonesia’s Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) to Gender-Related Issues. Muslim World, 110(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12367
Mills, K. A. (2018). What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117743465
Motion, J. (2005). Participative public relations: Power to the people or legitimacy for government discourse? Public Relations Review, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.009
Noer, K. U., Chadijah, S., & Rudiatin, E. (2021). There is no trustable data: the state and data accuracy of violence against women in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08552
Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More Trust in Fewer Followers: Diverging Effects of Popularity Metrics and Green Orientation Social Media Influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.002
Poell, T. (2019). Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest. Social Movement Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287
Prasetia, F. A. (2022). Langkah Polri Tak Tahan Putri Candrawathi Sesuai Rekomendasi Komnas Perempuan.
Riabov, O. (2020). The Symbol of the Motherland in the Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power in Contemporary Russia. Nationalities Papers, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.14
Rivers, D. J., & Ross, A. S. (2020). Authority (de)legitimation in the border wall Twitter discourse of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19105.riv
Ron, J., Pandya, A., & Crow, D. (2016). Universal values, foreign money: funding local human rights organizations in the global south. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1095780
Sadat, A., & Ilham, R. F. (2022). Mahfud MD Sebut Komnas HAM Masih Terjebak Dalam Skenario Sambo.
Singh, N. K., Tomar, D. S., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2020). Sentiment analysis: a review and comparative analysis over social media. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0862-8
St-Onge, C., Young, M., Eva, K. W., & Hodges, B. (2017). Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9716-3
Sunderland, J. (2020). Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. Open Linguistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0022
Syamili, C., & Rekha, R. V. (2021). Twitter and social movement: An analysis of tweets in response to the #metoo challenge. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.13187/IJMIL.2021.1.231
Tiidenberg, K., & Whelan, A. (2019). “Not like that, not for that, not by them”: social media affordances of critique. Communication and Critical/ Cultural Studies, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2019.1624797
Vaara, E. (2014). Struggles over legitimacy in the Eurozone crisis: Discursive legitimation strategies and their ideological underpinnings. Discourse and Society, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962
Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
Velasco, J. C. (2021). You are cancelled: Virtual collective consciousness and the emergence of cancel culture as ideological purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21659/RUPKATHA.V12N5.RIOC1S21N2
Yaǧcioǧlu, S., & Cem-Deǧer, A. (2001). Logos or mythos: (de)legitimation strategies in confrontational discourses of sociocultural ethos. Discourse and Society, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006005
Ye, Y., Xu, P., & Zhang, M. (2017). Social media, public discourse and civic engagement in modern China. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.021
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods Sixth Edition. In Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Sage Publication, Inc.
Yu, Y. (2022). Perpetuating and/or resisting the “leftover” myth? The use of (de)legitimation strategies in the Chinese English-language news media. Feminist Media Studies, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1837909