EVALUASI PROGRAM KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH BERDASARKAN THE PYRAMID MODEL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH

nfn Muntadliroh

Abstract

Indonesia menjadi negara penyumbang sampah plastik terbesar kedua di dunia. Sebagai respon antisipasi terkait hal tersebut, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan menginisiasi kebijakan kantong plastik berbayar melalui toko-toko ritel di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tahapan evaluasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah, yakni Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, dalam pelaksanaan program "kantong plastik berbayar" berdasarkan konsep The Pyramid Model of PR Research. Model ini menyediakan metode khusus pada tahap input, output, dan outcomes. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa proses evaluasi yang dilakukan pemerintah masih belum optimal karena hanya mengukur aspek yang terbatas. Evaluasi pada tahap input hanya mengukur tanggapan pelaku ritel dan tidak mencakup pesan komunikasi. Evaluasi pada tahap output dan outcomes hanya menekankan pengukuran persepsi konsumen. Evaluasi proses komunikasi, media, dan penetapan benchmark justru belum dilakukan.


Keywords


The Pyramid Model of PR Research, Program "Kantong Plastik Berbayar", Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan


References

Bissland, J.H. (1990) Accountability Gap: Evaluation Practices Show Improvement. Public Relations Review 16(2), pp. 25–35.

Cutlip, S. M. (2000). Effective Public Relations. USA: Prentice Hall.

Daugherty, E. (2003). Strategic Planning in Public Relations: A Matrix That Ensures Tactical Soundness. Public Relations Quarterly, 48 (1).

Gozali, D. M. (2005). Communication Measurement: Konsep dan Aplikasi Pengukuran Kinerja Public Relations. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Gregory, A. (2001). Public Relations and Evaluation: Does The Reality Match The Rhetoric? Journal of Marketing Communication, Vol. 7, pp. 171-189.

Harrison, S. (2000). Public Relations. An Introduction. USA: Thomson.

Hon, L. C. (1997). What Have You Done for Me Lately? Exploring Effectiveness in Public Relations. Journal of Rublic Relations Research, 9(1), pp. 1-30.

Hon, L. C. and Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidlines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations. Florida: The Institute for Public Relations.

Kazokiene, L., & Stravinskiene, J. (2007). Assessment of Public Relations Efficiency: Theoretical Approach. Changes in Social and Business Environment: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Panevezys, Lithuania: Selected Papers, pp. 93-97.

Kitchen, P. J. (1997). Public Relations: Principles and Practice. Publisher: Int. Thomson Business Press.

Macnamara, J. (1999). Research in Public Relations: A Review of the use of Evaluation and Formative Research. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 1(2), pp. 99-103.

Macnamara, J. (2002). PR Metrics: Research for Planning and Evaluation of PR and Corporate Communication. Mass Communication Group Pty Limited.

Noble, P. (1999). Towards an Inclusive Evaluation Methodology. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4 (1), pp. 14-23.

O’Sullivan, G.A.; Yonkler, J.A.; Morgan, W.; and Merritt, A.P. (2003). A Field Guide to Designing a Health Communication Strategy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

Ross, R. D. (1972). New Dimensions for PR with Management by Objectives. Advanced Management Journal, 37(3).

Seitel, F. P. (2001). Practice of Public Relations, 8th Edition, Publisher: Prentice Hall.

Smith, R. D. (2005). Strategic Planning for Public Relations. Second edt. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wilcox, D. L., Cameron, G. T., Agee, W. K., & Ault, P. H., (2003). Public Relations: Strategies and Tactics. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

Wylie, F. (1992). In D.L. Wilcox, P.H. Ault and W.K. Agee (eds.) Public Relations Strategies and Tactics, 5th edn. New York: Longman.

Artikel Online:

Are We There Yet? A Communications Evaluation Guide. The Communication Network. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: diakses pada 14 Maret 2018.

Evaluating Your Communication Tools: What Works? What Doesn’t? The Wesmintster Model. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: diakses pada 14 Maret 2018.

Guidelines for Measuring the Effectiveness of PR Programs and Activities. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: diakses pada 25 Mei 2018.

Mediaindonesia.com. (2017). Aprindo Kritisi Aturan Plastik Berbayar. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: diakses pada 14 Maret 2018.

Tirto.id. (2016). Maju Mundur Plastik Berbayar. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: diakses pada 23 Maret 2018.

Tirto.id. (2016). Menanti Payung Hukum Kokoh Untuk Diet Kantong Plastik. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: < https://tirto.id/menanti-payung-hukum-kokoh-untuk-diet-kantong-plastik-bsT7> diakses pada 29 Mei 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31346/jpikom.v21i1.2226

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


indexed by:

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.