Students’ Perception for Online Lectures Quality in Universities in Yogyakarta
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 1065
Download : 207
Main Article Content
Abstract
The World of Education during the Covid-19 outbreak had to take a solution or problem solving by carrying out Teaching and Learning Activities online. Schools, campuses and even informal education facilities must go on online as a security solution while continuing to carry out learning activities in the midst of this epidemic. This study looks at the extent to which students’ assessments of the quality of online lectures in Yogyakarta. 100 students as respondents from 14 Universities in Yogyakarta participated in this survey. This study uses a quantitative method with reference to, quality assessment in the 2019 SPADA Learning Object Development Guide from the Directorate General of Learning and Students Affairs, Kemristekdikti, 2019. From the results of the study, it was found that the learning plan indicator had the highest average percentage of items is 35,5%, then the media and technology indicators have the highest percentage of items at 37,63% and the assessment and evaluation indicators have an average percentage of items is 45% which all the percentage indicators are on a pretty good rating scale. This shows that the student’s assessment of the quality of online lectures in Yogyakarta during the Covid-19 outbreak was quite goods in its implementation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Arikunto, S. (2007). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2014). Panduan Pengembangan dan Penyelenggaraan KDITT. Jakarta : Kemendikbud.
Mustofa, Iklil Mokhamad.,Chodzirin, Muhammad., Sayekti, Lina. (2019). Formulasi Model Perkuliahan Daring Sebagai Upaya Menekan Disparitas Kualitas Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Terhadap Website pditt.belajar.kemdikbud.go.id), Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, Vol.1 No. 2 : 151 – 160.
Ditjen Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2019) Panduan Pengembangan Objek Pembelajaran SPADA 2019. Kemristekdikti.
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 222–226.
Dupin-Bryant, P. A. (2004). Pre-entry Variables Related to Retention in Online Distance Education. International Journal of Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_2
Huss, J., & Eastep, S. (2013). The Perceptions of Students toward Online Learning at a Midwestern University: What Are Students Telling Us and What Are We Doing about It?. I.E.: Inquiry in Education, 4(2).
Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ Perceptions toward the Web-based Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of an Undergraduate Hybrid Instructional Model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. https://doi.org/10.28945/316
L. Smart, K., & J. Cappel, J. (2006). Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(December), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/243
Platt, C., Amber, N., & Yu, N. (2014). Virtually the Same?: Student Perceptions of the Equivalence of Online Classes to Face-to-Face Classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 489.
Rao, P. H. (2014). Measuring Environmental Performance across a Green Supply Chain: A Managerial Overview of Environmental Indicators. Vikalpa. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920140104
Waldman, L., Perreault, H., Alexander, M., & Zhao, J. (2009). Comparing the Perceptions of Online Learning between Students with Experience and Those New to Online Learning. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal.
Ward, M. O., Grinstein, G., & Keim, D. (2020). - Human Perception and Information Processing. In Interactive Data Visualization. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18379-7