Students’ Perception for Online Lectures Quality in Universities in Yogyakarta

Bilah Samping Artikel

PDF (Inggris)
Diterbitkan: Dec 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v6i3.3701
Kata Kunci:
Keywords, Covid-19, Quality of Online Lectures, Higher Education, Yogyakarta
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 1065
Download : 207
Crossmark/ Data Version

Isi Artikel Utama

Astri Wulandari
Mercu Buana University Yogyakarta

Abstrak

The World of Education during the Covid-19 outbreak had to take a solution or problem solving by carrying out Teaching and Learning Activities online. Schools, campuses and even informal education facilities must go on online as a security solution while continuing to carry out learning activities in the midst of this epidemic. This study looks at the extent to which students’ assessments of the quality of online lectures in Yogyakarta. 100 students as respondents from 14 Universities in Yogyakarta participated in this survey. This study uses a quantitative method with reference to, quality assessment in the 2019 SPADA Learning Object Development Guide from the Directorate General of Learning and Students Affairs, Kemristekdikti, 2019. From the results of the study, it was found that the learning plan indicator had the highest average percentage of items is 35,5%, then the media and technology indicators have the highest percentage of items at 37,63% and the assessment and evaluation indicators have an average percentage of items is 45% which all the percentage indicators are on a pretty good rating scale. This shows that the student’s assessment of the quality of online lectures in Yogyakarta during the Covid-19 outbreak was quite goods in its implementation.

Rincian Artikel

Terbitan
Vol 6 (2021): Special Issue: The Role of Communication and Information Technology in the struggle against Covid-19
Bagian
Komunikasi
Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Kebijakan yang diajukan untuk jurnal yang menawarkan akses terbuka

Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:

  1. Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
  2. Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
  3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).
Biografi Penulis

Astri Wulandari, Mercu Buana University Yogyakarta

Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi

Referensi

Arikunto, S. (2007). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2014). Panduan Pengembangan dan Penyelenggaraan KDITT. Jakarta : Kemendikbud.

Mustofa, Iklil Mokhamad.,Chodzirin, Muhammad., Sayekti, Lina. (2019). Formulasi Model Perkuliahan Daring Sebagai Upaya Menekan Disparitas Kualitas Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Terhadap Website pditt.belajar.kemdikbud.go.id), Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, Vol.1 No. 2 : 151 – 160.

Ditjen Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2019) Panduan Pengembangan Objek Pembelajaran SPADA 2019. Kemristekdikti.

Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 222–226.

Dupin-Bryant, P. A. (2004). Pre-entry Variables Related to Retention in Online Distance Education. International Journal of Phytoremediation. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_2

Huss, J., & Eastep, S. (2013). The Perceptions of Students toward Online Learning at a Midwestern University: What Are Students Telling Us and What Are We Doing about It?. I.E.: Inquiry in Education, 4(2).

Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ Perceptions toward the Web-based Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of an Undergraduate Hybrid Instructional Model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. https://doi.org/10.28945/316

L. Smart, K., & J. Cappel, J. (2006). Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(December), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/243

Platt, C., Amber, N., & Yu, N. (2014). Virtually the Same?: Student Perceptions of the Equivalence of Online Classes to Face-to-Face Classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 489.

Rao, P. H. (2014). Measuring Environmental Performance across a Green Supply Chain: A Managerial Overview of Environmental Indicators. Vikalpa. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920140104

Waldman, L., Perreault, H., Alexander, M., & Zhao, J. (2009). Comparing the Perceptions of Online Learning between Students with Experience and Those New to Online Learning. Information Technology, Learning & Performance Journal.

Ward, M. O., Grinstein, G., & Keim, D. (2020). - Human Perception and Information Processing. In Interactive Data Visualization. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18379-7