Analysis Of Republished Hoaxes

Main Article Content

Agus Ari Iswara

Abstract

This study is about repeated hoaxes. This is qualitative research. The online library method was applied to collect references, theories, and data. Data triangulation was needed to ensure that the data used were fact-checked and verified as hoaxes. Data collected by the tapping method and note-taking technique. Data were collected from Turnbackhoax.id. The ‘Search’ menu on the Turnbackhoax.id website was used to find data with some keywords. Data were presented in the form of links of the fact-checked result of old hoaxes and recycled hoaxes followed with its clarification. Data analysis used the descriptive method assisted by the triangulation method with theories. The result of this study showed hoax producers got an advantage over internal and external factors. The internal factor, hoax maker chose topics that seem important and were presented with a persuasive or provocative narrative. The first external factor was the level of literation of the recipient of the information. Second, environmental conditions or momentum that supported the spread of repeated hoaxes. Then, the momentum that could trigger friction in society also supports the circulation of repeated hoaxes.

Article Details

Section
Mass Media

References

Arisanty, M., Wiradharma, G., Riady, Y., Permatasari, S. M., & Sediyaningsih, S. (2021). Pengujian Konstruk Motif Sikap Penerimaan Dan Perilaku Membagikan Kembali Informasi Hoaks Dalam Media Sosial. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 25(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.4366

Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Science, 9(185), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185

Fatmawati, S., Salzabila, R., Rizkitama, G. A., & Nugroho, R. A. (2019). Analisis Berita Hoaks Di Korpus Sosial Media Guna Mengembangkan Model “Kapak Hoaks” (Kemandirian Pembaca Menganalisis Konten Hoaks) Studi Analisis Wacana Kritis. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i2.2525

Ferdiawan, Y. I., Nurjanah, P. A. D., Krisdyan, E. P., Hidayatullah, A., Sirait, H. J. M., & Rakhmawati, N. A. (2019). HOAX Impact to Community Through Social Media Indonesia. Cakrawala, 19(1), 121–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v19i1

First Draft. (2019). Understanding Information Disorder. First Draft.

Iswara, A. A. (2021a). Hoaks Satire Sebagai Cyberbullying Dalam Konteks Isu Politik. Jurnal Pekommas, 6(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2021.2060207

Iswara, A. A. (2021b). Komposisi Dan Modifikasi Narasi Pada Hoaks Berulang. Linguistik Indonesia, 39(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v39i2.239

Iswara, A. A., & Bisena, K. A. (2020). Manipulation And Persuasion Through Language Features In Fake News. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 6(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.6.1.1338.26-32

Mastel. (2017). Hasil Survey Mastel Tentang Wabah Hoaks Nasional. Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://mastel.id/hasil-survey-wabah-hoaks-nasional-2017/

Rahadi, D. R. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna dan Informasi Hoax di Media Sosial. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v5i1.1342

Salam, A. (2018). The Hoax Phenomenon in Indonesian Society: Observing Anti-Diversity Memes since 2014. HUMANIORA, 30(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i3.38891

Turnbackhoax.id. (n.d.). No Title. Retrieved from http://turnbackhoax.id/

Utami, P. (2018). Hoax in Modern Politics: The Meaning of Hoax in Indonesian Politics and Democracy. X in Indonesian Politics and Democracy, 22(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.34614

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Journalism FakeNews Disinformation. (C. Ireton & J. Posetti, Eds.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Yustitia, S., & Ashrianto, P. D. (2020). An Analysis on COVID-19 Disinformation Triangle in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikator, 12(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.122040