Analysis Of Republished Hoaxes
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is about repeated hoaxes. This is qualitative research. The online library method was applied to collect references, theories, and data. Data triangulation was needed to ensure that the data used were fact-checked and verified as hoaxes. Data collected by the tapping method and note-taking technique. Data were collected from Turnbackhoax.id. The ‘Search’ menu on the Turnbackhoax.id website was used to find data with some keywords. Data were presented in the form of links of the fact-checked result of old hoaxes and recycled hoaxes followed with its clarification. Data analysis used the descriptive method assisted by the triangulation method with theories. The result of this study showed hoax producers got an advantage over internal and external factors. The internal factor, hoax maker chose topics that seem important and were presented with a persuasive or provocative narrative. The first external factor was the level of literation of the recipient of the information. Second, environmental conditions or momentum that supported the spread of repeated hoaxes. Then, the momentum that could trigger friction in society also supports the circulation of repeated hoaxes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Arisanty, M., Wiradharma, G., Riady, Y., Permatasari, S. M., & Sediyaningsih, S. (2021). Pengujian Konstruk Motif Sikap Penerimaan Dan Perilaku Membagikan Kembali Informasi Hoaks Dalam Media Sosial. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 25(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.4366
Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2020). Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review. Social Science, 9(185), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9100185
Fatmawati, S., Salzabila, R., Rizkitama, G. A., & Nugroho, R. A. (2019). Analisis Berita Hoaks Di Korpus Sosial Media Guna Mengembangkan Model “Kapak Hoaks” (Kemandirian Pembaca Menganalisis Konten Hoaks) Studi Analisis Wacana Kritis. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 15(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v15i2.2525
Ferdiawan, Y. I., Nurjanah, P. A. D., Krisdyan, E. P., Hidayatullah, A., Sirait, H. J. M., & Rakhmawati, N. A. (2019). HOAX Impact to Community Through Social Media Indonesia. Cakrawala, 19(1), 121–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v19i1
First Draft. (2019). Understanding Information Disorder. First Draft.
Iswara, A. A. (2021a). Hoaks Satire Sebagai Cyberbullying Dalam Konteks Isu Politik. Jurnal Pekommas, 6(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2021.2060207
Iswara, A. A. (2021b). Komposisi Dan Modifikasi Narasi Pada Hoaks Berulang. Linguistik Indonesia, 39(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v39i2.239
Iswara, A. A., & Bisena, K. A. (2020). Manipulation And Persuasion Through Language Features In Fake News. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 6(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.6.1.1338.26-32
Mastel. (2017). Hasil Survey Mastel Tentang Wabah Hoaks Nasional. Retrieved March 25, 2021, from https://mastel.id/hasil-survey-wabah-hoaks-nasional-2017/
Rahadi, D. R. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna dan Informasi Hoax di Media Sosial. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v5i1.1342
Salam, A. (2018). The Hoax Phenomenon in Indonesian Society: Observing Anti-Diversity Memes since 2014. HUMANIORA, 30(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.22146/jh.v30i3.38891
Turnbackhoax.id. (n.d.). No Title. Retrieved from http://turnbackhoax.id/
Utami, P. (2018). Hoax in Modern Politics: The Meaning of Hoax in Indonesian Politics and Democracy. X in Indonesian Politics and Democracy, 22(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.34614
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Journalism FakeNews Disinformation. (C. Ireton & J. Posetti, Eds.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Yustitia, S., & Ashrianto, P. D. (2020). An Analysis on COVID-19 Disinformation Triangle in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikator, 12(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.122040