ICT Adoption in Indonesian’s Houses of Representative: TAM Analysis and Lessons From UK Parliament

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 11, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v9i2.5581
Keywords:
ICT Adoption, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Big Data Management
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 55
Download : 18
Crossmark/ Data Version

Main Article Content

Handrini Ardiyanti
Universitas Esa Unggul

Abstract

This study analyzes the adoption of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Indonesian House of Representatives through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and draws lessons from the UK Parliament. The analysis is divided into four parts: 1) Historical context and policy framework of ICT adoption in the Indonesian House of Representatives; 2) Policy and strategy of ICT adoption in the Indonesian House of Representatives; 3) Best practice from the UK Parliament; and 4) Challenges of Big Data Management in the Indonesian House of Representatives. The study provides an in-depth understanding of ICT adoption in the Indonesian House of Representatives and valuable lessons from the UK Parliament experience to enhance ICT adoption effectiveness. Study conclusions include: 1) The importance of a Big Data system, particularly for bill digest summaries; 2) The early stage of ICT adoption in the Indonesian House of Representatives; 3) Prioritization of bill digest availability to enhance public engagement in the legislative process; 4) Crucial collaboration with state institutions for Big Data integration, aligned with the national one data initiative. The Indonesian House of Representatives plays a central role in providing legislative data in Indonesia.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): December 2024
Section
Informatics
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The proposed policy for journals that offer open access

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

References

Abu-Shanab, Emad, Raya Al-Dalou, and Rawan Ali Talafha. 2018. “E-Parliament in Jordan: Challenges and Perspectives.” International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 4 (4): 516–31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2018.095265.

Booth, Anne. 2021. A Diagnostic Study of the Civil Service in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies. Vol. 57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1956406.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21-53.

Cavanillas, J. M., & Curry, E. (2016). New Horizonsf or a Data-Driven Economy: A Roadmap for Usage and Exploitation of Big Data in Europe. (J. M. Cavanillas, E. Curry, & W. Wahlster, Eds.) Saarbru¨cken, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21569-3

Chung, A. Q., Andreev, P., Benyoucef, M., Duane, A., & O’Reilly, P. (2017). Managing an organisation’s social media presence: An empirical stages of growth model. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.10.003

Davis, F. D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology". MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008.

Ferber, Paul, Franz Foltz, and Rudy Pugliese. 2005. “Computer-Mediated Communication in the Arizona Legislature: Applying Media Richness Theory to Member and Staff Communication.” State and Local Government Review 37 (2): 142–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x0503700205.

Fitsilis, Fotios, Dimitris Koryzis, Vasilios Svolopoulos, and Dimitris Spiliotopoulos. 2017. “Implementing Digital Parliament Innovative Concepts for Citizens and Policy Makers.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 10293 LNCS (April 2018): 154–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58481-2_13.

Gultekin, Yasar Selman. 2018. “Stakeholder Analysis and Stakeholder Management: A Conceptual Framework for Turkish Forestry.” International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies 5 (3): 142–57.

Hanafizadeh, Payam, and Sepideh Shafia. 2021. “Appropriate Social Media Platforms Commensurate with the Maturity of Organizations.” Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy 9 (3): 12–57. https://doi.org/10.18080/JTDE.V9N3.421.

Kusumawardani, V., & Rohmah, U. (2018). Adopsi inovasi penyuluhan keamanan pangan badan pengawas obat dan makanan republik indonesia. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 22(1), 45–64. http://www.pom.go.id/penyidikan/media.php?hal=jenis_pelanggaran&halaman=1

Lautenbacher, Olli Philippe. 2012. “From Still Pictures to Moving Pictures: Eye-Tracking Text and Image.” Eye-Tracking in Audiovisual Translation., January 2012: 135–55.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 69-73.

Park, H., & Lee, K. (2019). "Assessing the Impact of ICT Adoption on Parliamentary Performance: A Case Study of South Korea". International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 574-588. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1441719

Putra, E. L., Suseno, J., & Napitupulu, D. (2023). Pengembangan Aplikasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Design Science Research (DSR) Berdasarkan Analisis Technology Readiness Index ( TRI ) dan Technology Acceptance Model ( TAM ) Application Development Using Design Science Research ( DSR ) Methodology Based. Jurnal Pekommas, 8(2), 137–148.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.

Sanofi, Z., & Sherlin, I. (2023). Analisis Model UTAUT pada Adopsi TIK di Institusi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). Jurnal Pekommas, 8(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v8i2.5142

Singh, R., & Kumar, A. (2019). "ICT Adoption in Indian Parliament: Challenges and Prospects". Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(4), 460-476. doi:10.1080/17516234.2018.1477346

Smith, J. A., & Jones, B. C. (2019). "Digital Transformation in Parliamentary Settings: Challenges and Opportunities". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 567-584. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy070.

Tipton, S. M. (2002). Social Differentiation and moral pluralism. In R. Madsen, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler & S.M. Tipton (Eds.), Meaning and Modernity, Religion, Polity and Self (pp. 15-40). Berkley: University of California Press.

Varvasovszky, Z. 2000. “A Stakeholder Analysis.” Health Policy and Planning 15 (3): 338–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/15.3.338

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications: 87-92.