Quality Measurement of Ministry of RI Website with Combination of Linear Weightage Method and Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations (Mengukur Kualitas Website Kementerian RI dengan Kombinasi Metode Linear Weightage dan Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper provides a new approach in combining the quality of some ministry websites through quantitative and qualitative approach. Quantitative data are obtained by performing measurement using web diagnostic tools while the qualitative approach is carried out through expert judgement. Then the weights will be calculated from the data obtained both quantitatively and qualitatively by applying linear weightage for quantitative data and using consistent fuzzy preference relations method for qualitative data. In the final stage, those two methods will be combined so that we will obtain the final weights which are the representation of the quality of websites measured.The results obtained by this research can be considered by the relevant ministry to develop their websites.
Artikel ini memberikan pendekatan baru dalam membandingkan kualitas beberapa laman kementerian RI melalui pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Data kuantitatif didapatkan dengan melakukan pengukuran menggunakan web diagnostic software sedangkan pendekatan kualitatif dilakukan melalui expert judgement. Data yang didapatkan baik secara kuantitatif maupun kualitatif akan dihitung bobot (weight) dengan mengaplikasikan metode linear weightage. Data kualitatif dengan metode consistent fuzzy preference relations digunakan untuk menghitung bobot dari expert judgement yang telah didapatkan. Kemudian kedua metode tersebut akan dikombinasikan sehingga akan didapatkan bobot akhir yang merupakan representasi dari kualitas website yang telah diukur. Hasil pembobotan yang didapatkan dalam penelitian ini dapat dijadikan rujukan dan pertimbangan untuk pihak kementrian terkait untuk melakukan pengembangan website yang dikelolanya.
Article Details
The proposed policy for journals that offer open access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
References
Chao, R.-J., & Chen, Y.-H. (2009). Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10657–10662.
Dominic, P., & Jati, H. (2011). A comparison of Asian airlines websites quality: using a non-parametric test. Internal Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(5), 499 - 523.
Dominic, P., Jati, H., & Hanim, S. (2013). University website quality comparison by using non-parametric statistical test: a case study from Malaysia. International Journal of Operational Research, 16(3), 349 - 374.
Iryanti, E., & Pandiya, R. (2016). Evaluating the quality of e-learning using consistent fuzzy preference relations method. IEEE 6th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET). Bandung.
Kusumawardani, R. P., & Agintiara, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method for decision making in human resource manager selection process. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 638 – 646.
Li, F., & Li'a, Y. (2011). Usability evaluation of e-commerce on B2C websites in China. Procedia Engineering, 15, 5299 – 5304.
Pandiya, R., Wahyudin, A., & Nareswari, S. P. (2016). Penentuan skala prioritas regulasi tarif interkoneksi menggunakan metode fuzzy QFD - TOPSIS. Jurnal Pekommas, 1(1), 77 - 88.
Roy, S., Pattnaik, P. K., & Mall, R. (2014). A quantitative approach to evaluate usability of academic websites based on human perception. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 15, 159–167.
Saaty. (1988). Decision making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995 – 1004.
Sun, C.-C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7745–7754.
Turskis, Z., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. International Journal of Computers communications & control, 10(6), 873-888.