Indonesia Journalistic Code of Ethics (News Aggregation Study)

Bilah Samping Artikel

PDF turnitin STUDI TERHADAP NEWS AGREGATOR DA STUDI TERHADAP NEWS AGREGATOR DA
Diterbitkan: Oct 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2019.2040210
Kata Kunci:
Indonesian Press Council, Journalistic Code of Ethics, media press, news aggregator
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 769
Download : 10228
Crossmark/ Data Version

Isi Artikel Utama

Dyah Permana Erawaty
Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Indonesia Gedung Komunikasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat 16424, Telp. (021) 7270006
nfn Irwansyah
Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Indonesia Gedung Komunikasi FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Jawa Barat 16424, Telp. (021) 7270006

Abstrak

News aggregation is the process of taking news from published sources, reshaping it, and publishing it as a new news. News aggregation becomes an important part of journalism. This research intends to examine whether the news aggregation complies with journalistic principles in Indonesia or not. The significance of this research for the Indonesian community is that they understand the news aggregation in the context of Indonesian journalism. This research used a qualitative approach in the post-positivist paradigm. Data was collected by narrative literature review and interviews. The informants were the expert from the Indonesia Press Council. In addition, to see trends in the qualitative use of news aggregations, interviews were conducted with three news aggregation users. The analysis resulted that the news aggregator is not a journalistic media, because it has not yet met the criteria of Indonesian Law no. 40 of 1999 concerning the Press, as well as the Cyber Media guidelines. The news aggregator content are news and opinions those were collected from the press media and social media. Even though the news aggregators content was not believed to be true, smartphone users will continue to use it.

Rincian Artikel

Terbitan
Vol 4 No 2 (2019): October 2019
Bagian
Media Massa

Kebijakan yang diajukan untuk jurnal yang menawarkan akses terbuka

Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:

  1. Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
  2. Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
  3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).

Referensi

Lashinsky, A. (2009). Eric Schmidt wishes Google could save newspapers - Jan. 7, 2009. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from http://archive.fortune.com/2009/01/07/technology/lashinsky_google.fortune/index.htm

Anderson, C. W. (2013). What aggregators do: Towards a networked concept of journalistic expertise in the digital age. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913492460

Athey, S., Mobius, M., & Pal, J. (2017). The Impact of Aggregators on Internet News.

Brs. (2014). Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. Retrieved May 25, 2019, from https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/4286/pengguna-internet-indonesia-nomor-enam-dunia/0/sorotan_media

Crichton D., Christel B., Shidham A., Valderrama A., & Karmel J. (2010). Introduction | Journalism in the Digital Age. Retrieved May 26, 2019, from https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2010-11/Journalism/index7f0d.html?page_id=16

Davies, P. (2000). The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice Oxford Review of Education. Oxford Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/3054980020001882

Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (2009). The value of “traditional” reviews in the era of systematic reviewing. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31819c59c6

Duffy, A., Tandoc, E. C., & Ling, R. (2018). Frankenstein journalism. Information Communication and Society, 21(10), 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313884

Edo, C., Yunquera, J., & Bastos, H. (2019). Content syndication in news aggregators. Towards devaluation of professional journalistic criteria. Comunicar. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-03

Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., & Brosius, H. B. (2018). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269

Green, B.N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative review of the literature for peer-revied journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals : secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(Number 3), 101–117.

Jeon, D. S., & Nasr, N. (2016). News aggregators and competition among newspapers on the internet. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140151

King, W. R. (2005). Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems.

Lee, A. M., & Chyi, H. I. (2015). The Rise of Online News Aggregators: Consumption and Competition. JMM International Journal on Media Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2014.997383

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Reuters Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576

Oxman, A. D. (1994). Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648

Oxman, A. D., Cook, D. J., Guyatt, G. H., Bass, E., Brill-Edwards, P., Browman, G., … Wilson, M. (1994). Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: VI. How to Use an Overview. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520170077040

Puddephatt, A. (2011). The Importance of self regulation of the media in upholding freedom of expression; Series CI debates: communication and information; Vol.:9; 2011. Rio de Janeiro: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001916/191624e.pdf

Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59

Sackett, D. L. (1981). How to read clinical journals. Canadian Medical Association Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X8100100308

We Are Social. (2018). Digital in 2018 Global Overview. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocial/digital-in-2018-global-overview-86860338

Williams, C. J. (1998). The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008299304900