STUDI NETNOGRAFI POST-TRUTH DALAM PERCAKAPAN POLITIK PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN 2019 DI FACEBOOK
Article Sidebar
Read Counter : 1753
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pemilihan Umum Presiden (Pilpres) 2019 berlangsung dalam era post-truth. Selama penyelenggaraan Pilpres 2019 tersebut, konten-konten post-truth membanjiri linimasa media sosial, khususnya Facebook. Konten posttruth tersebut tercermin melalui materi hoax dan fakenews yang sengaja disebarkan demi kepentingan politik. Facebook menjadi salah satu media paling efektif yang digunakan untuk menyebarkan konten post-truth. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran konten post-truth di Facebook, yakni di grup Facebook Sukoharjo Makmur. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dengan menggunakan metode netnografi yang mendapatkan data melalui observasi online. Observasi mencakup penggunaan visual teks, foto, video, dan cara penyampaian pesan post-truth. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pesan post-truth yang diunggah di Facebook menggunakan berbagai jenis konten seperti teks, foto, video, gabungan teks dan foto, dan juga gabungan teks dan video
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Author (s) hold copyrights and retain copyrights of articles if the article is accepted for publishing.
- Author grant the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Public allowed to Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) this journal article content.
References
Annisa, S. (2019). Studi Netnografi Aksi Beat Plastic Pollution Oleh United Nations Environment di Instagram. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(6), 1109-1123.
Ade-Johnson, C.S., & Ajayi, J.O. (2014). Application of Social Media to Organization Branding in Nigeria. J Mass Communicat Journalism, 4(227), 2.
Ball, J. (2016). Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. London: Ebury Press.
Berge, F., & Gaede, J. (2017). A Netnographic Study of The Company-Owned Facebook Pages of Nike and Adidas. Uppsala Universitet.
Berapa Pengguna Media Sosial Indonesia. (2019). Tersedia dalam https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/02/08/berapa-pengguna-media-sosial-indonesia, diakses tanggal 5 November 2019.
Boellstorff, T., et al. (2012). Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.
Daya Rusak Pola Post-Truth. (2019). Beritasatu.com. Tersedia dalam https://www.beritasatu.com/politik/551105/daya-rusak-pola-posttruth-sangat-besar, diakses tanggal 15 Desember 2019.
Fraune, C., & Knodt, M. (2018). Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science 43, 1–7.
Jatmiko, M.I. (2019). Post-Truth, Media Sosial, dan Misinformasi: Pergolakan Wacana Politik Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jurnal Tabligh. Volume 20 No 1, 21 – 39.
Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin‘s Press.
Kozinets, R. V.(2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage Publications.
Khan, Gohar F. (2017). Social Media for Government: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Implementing, and Managing Social Media Tools in the Public Sphere. Singapore. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Kriyantono, R. (2009). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Perdana Media Group.
Littlejohn, S.W, Foss, K.A, Oetzel, J.G. (2017). Theories of humas commnucation. Eleventh Edition. Illinois. Waveland Press.
Lombard, M, Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C.C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human commnunication Research, 28(4), 587-604.
McIntyre. L. (2018). Post-truth. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Montagut, B.R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716-735.
Nasrullah, R. (2018). Etnografi Virtual. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Picciotto, Robert. (2018). Is evaluation obsolete in a post-truth world?. Evaluation and Program Planning 73, 88–96.
Rakhmat, J. (1999). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Dilengkapi Contoh Analisis Statistik. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Syuhada, K.D. (2017). Etika Media di Era “Post-Truth”. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, VI(1), 75-79.
Treem, J.W., & Leonardi, P.M. (2013). Social Media use in organizations: Exploring the affordance of visibility, edibality, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association 36(1), 143-189.
Trotter, P.A, & Maconachie, R. (2018). Populism, post-truth politics and the failure to deceive the public in Uganda’s energy debate. Energy Research & Social Science 43, 61–76.